ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Deep Learning Analysis Using
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Meta-Analysis of Deep-Learning-Based Fusion of Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography in Oncologic Imaging.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- A review of deep learning-based multimodal data integration of lung cancer.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- 2.5D deep learning radiomics and clinical data for predicting occult lymph node metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- CT-based radiomics-deep learning model predicts occult lymph node metastasis in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma patients: A multicenter study.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025Article
- AI-based prediction of pathological risk factors in lung adenocarcinoma from CT imaging: bridging innovation and clinical practice.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- A Hybrid CNN-Transformer Model for Predicting N Staging and Survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Based on CT-Scan.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
- Additional Value of PET and CT Image-Based Features in the Detection of Occult Lymph Node Metastases in Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Construction and Evaluation of a Preoperative Prediction Model for Lymph Node Metastasis of cIA Lung Adenocarcinoma Using Random Forest.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
- A 3 M Evaluation Protocol for Examining Lymph Nodes in Cancer Patients: Multi-Modal, Multi-Omics, Multi-Stage Approach.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this work was to determine the feasibility of using a deep learning approach to predict occult lymph node metastasis (OLM) based on preoperative FDG-PET/CT images in patients with clinical node-negative (cN0) lung adenocarcinoma. Materials and Methods: Dataset 1 (for training and internal validation) included 376 consecutive patients with cN0 lung adenocarcinoma from our hospital between May 2012 and May 2021. Dataset 2 (for prospective test) used 58 consecutive patients with cN0 lung adenocarcinoma from June 2021 to February 2022 at the same center. Three deep learning models: PET alone, CT alone, and combined model, were developed for the prediction of OLM. The performance of the models was evaluated on internal validation and prospective test in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs). Results: The combined model incorporating PET and CT showed the best performance, achieved an AUC of 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61, 1.00] in the prediction of OLM in internal validation set (n = 60) and an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.99) in the prospective test set (n = 58). The model achieved 87.50% sensitivity, 80.00% specificity, and 81.00% accuracy in the internal validation set and achieved 75.00% sensitivity, 88.46% specificity, and 86.60% accuracy in the prospective test set. Conclusion: This study presented a deep learning approach to enable the prediction of occult nodal involvement based on the PET/CT images before surgery in cN0 lung adenocarcinoma, which would help clinicians select patients who would be suitable for sublobar resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.