Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35874967›Full record

ArticleTopoi : an international review of philosophy2014

Infants Understand How Testimony Works.

Paul L Harris, Jonathan D Lane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Topoi : an international review of philosophy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Young children share imagined possibilities: evidence for an early-emerging human competence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Obstacles to the spread of unintuitive beliefs.Evolutionary human sciences · 2019
    Article
  7. Does intention matter? Relations between parent pointing, infant pointing, and developing language ability.Journal of cognition and development : official journal of the Cognitive Development Society · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Young children communicate their ignorance and ask questions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  10. How language shapes the cultural inheritance of categories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  11. The Developmental Origins of Selective Social Learning.Current directions in psychological science · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paul L HarrisHarvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jonathan D LaneHarvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

Children's Acquisition of Counterintuitive ConceptsF32HD069099 · NICHD · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI LANE, JONATHAN D. · 2012 to 2014
$150k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD069099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children learn about the world from the testimony of other people, often coming to accept what they are told about a variety of unobservable and indeed counterintuitive phenomena. However, research on children's learning from testimony has paid limited attention to the foundations of that capacity. We ask whether those foundations can be observed in infancy. We review evidence from two areas of research: infants' sensitivity to the emotional expressions of other people; and their capacity to understand the exchange of information through non-verbal gestures and vocalization. We conclude that a grasp of the bi-directional exchange of information is present early in the second year. We discuss the implications for future research, especially across different cultural settings.

Indexed as

Head gesturesInfantsJoint attentionPointingSocial referencingTestimony

Identifiers

PMID35874967
PMCPMC9306287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.