Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35874851›Full record

ArticlePulmonary circulation2022

Social determinants of health in pulmonary arterial hypertension patients in the United States: Clinician perspective and health policy implications.

Vijay R Nadipelli, Jean M Elwing, Willie H Oglesby, Karim El-Kersh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A new day has come: Sotatercept for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2025
    Review
  8. Exploring the patient perspective in pulmonary hypertension.The European respiratory journal · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vijay R NadipelliJefferson College of Population Health Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0314-729X
Jean M ElwingDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio USA.
Willie H OglesbyJefferson College of Population Health Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Karim El-KershPulmonary, Critical Care, & Sleep Medicine Division University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha Nebraska USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1285-3628
Thomas Jefferson University · USNebraska Medical Center · USUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social determinants of health (SDoH) can impact the vulnerable pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) population, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Providers' understanding of SDoH at the point of care and their impact is unknown. We conducted semi-structured virtual interviews with US clinicians at 17 pulmonary hypertension (PH) centers and one patient advocate from the Pulmonary Hypertension Association. We sought participants' perspective on SDoH in PAH and their impact. Transcripts were developed and analyzed for key themes to assess potential policy implications. Participants served a large PAH population and demonstrated high awareness of SDoH and its impact on treatment and outcomes. They reported that patients' SDoH, including socioeconomic status, health insurance, access to health care, education levels, health literacy, employment status, and insecurities associated with housing, food, transportation, and family support, impacted health and well-being. COVID-19-related social isolation, mental health, and substance abuse contributed to significant inequities in care provision and outcomes. While telemedicine helped clinicians manage patients remotely during the pandemic, there was a concern for patients with limited access to this medium. Participants reported no formal screening for SDoH at the point of care. With the recognition and the desire to act upon health inequities associated with SDoH, participants felt that it was vital for their centers to have a dedicated PH social worker and support staff to optimize care and outcomes. An approach that integrates SDoH in PAH care management, streamlined through institutional policy, could address health disparities leading to improved healthcare access, outcomes, and quality of care.

Indexed as

healthcare disparitieshealth equitypopulation healthrare diseasesocial needs

Identifiers

PMID35874851
PMCPMC9297028
OpenAlexW4284973680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.