Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35874794›Full record

ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2022

Young adult preference analysis on the attributes of COVID-19 vaccine in the Philippines: A conjoint analysis approach.

Ardvin Kester S Ong, Yogi Tri Prasetyo, Fae Coleen Lagura, Rochelle Nicole Ramos, Jose Ma Luis Salazar, Keenan Mark Sigua, Jomy Anne Villas, Thanatorn Chuenyindee, Reny Nadlifatin, Satria Fadil Persada and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Ardvin Kester S OngSchool of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Mapúa University, 658 Muralla St., Intramuros, Manila, 1002, Philippines.
Yogi Tri PrasetyoSchool of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Mapúa University, 658 Muralla St., Intramuros, Manila, 1002, Philippines.
Fae Coleen LaguraYoung Innovators Research Center, Mapúa University, 658 Muralla, St., Intramuros, Manila, 1002, Philippines.
Rochelle Nicole RamosYoung Innovators Research Center, Mapúa University, 658 Muralla, St., Intramuros, Manila, 1002, Philippines.
Jose Ma Luis SalazarYoung Innovators Research Center, Mapúa University, 658 Muralla, St., Intramuros, Manila, 1002, Philippines.
Keenan Mark SiguaYoung Innovators Research Center, Mapúa University, 658 Muralla, St., Intramuros, Manila, 1002, Philippines.
Jomy Anne VillasYoung Innovators Research Center, Mapúa University, 658 Muralla, St., Intramuros, Manila, 1002, Philippines.
Thanatorn ChuenyindeeSchool of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Mapúa University, 658 Muralla St., Intramuros, Manila, 1002, Philippines.
Reny NadlifatinDepartment of Information Systems, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS Sukolilo, Surabaya, 60111, Indonesia.
Satria Fadil PersadaEntrepreneurship Department, BINUS Business School Undergraduate Program, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, 11480, Indonesia.
Kriengkrai ThanaDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Aviation Management, Navaminda Kasatriyadhiraj Royal Air Force Academy, Bangkok, 10220, Thailand.
Mapúa University · PHBinus University · IDNavamindradhiraj University · THSepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Vaccines are utilized to prevent the severity of illnesses like the COVID-19 virus. Currently, there are a lot of COVID-19 vaccines available in the market like Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson and Johnson, and Sinovac. This research aimed to analyze the preference on the existing vaccine attributes of COVID-19. Study design: Specifically, this study considered 7 attributes such as cost, brand, recommendations, efficacy, side effects, vaccine type, and dose. Methods: A conjoint analysis with orthogonal design was utilized and 865 respondents were participated. Results: The result showed that consumers considered brand as the highest attribute, specifically Pfizer and Moderna among other brands. Moreover, the efficacy of 90% and higher were the preferred vaccine with 1 in 100 patient side effects reported. It was seen that safety and effectiveness is the priority in choosing a COVID-19 vaccine. Interestingly, the knowledge and understanding of the COVID-19 vaccine was found to drive consumer's preference for the vaccines available. Conclusions: The findings of this study could be utilized by the government to increase the willingness to be vaccinated. Lastly, the result of this study would pave a way to promote herd immunity to help fight the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide.

Indexed as

COVID-19 vaccineFilipinosOrthogonal design

Identifiers

PMID35874794
PMCPMC9293378
OpenAlexW4285807879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.