Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35874694›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2022

Neoantigens and NK Cells: "Trick or Treat" the Cancers?

Dan Lv, Muhammad Babar Khawar, Zhengyan Liang, Yu Gao, Haibo Sun

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Human leukocyte antigen and tumor immunotherapy (Review).International journal of oncology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dan LvInstitute of Translational Medicine, Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Muhammad Babar KhawarInstitute of Translational Medicine, Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Zhengyan LiangInstitute of Translational Medicine, Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Yu GaoInstitute of Translational Medicine, Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Haibo SunInstitute of Translational Medicine, Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Yangzhou University · CNAnqing Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy has become an important treatment strategy for cancer patients nowadays. Targeting cancer neoantigens presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, which emerge as a result of non-synonymous somatic mutations with high immunogenicity, is one of the most promising cancer immunotherapy strategies. Currently, several therapeutic options based on the personalized or shared neoantigens have been developed, including neoantigen vaccine and adoptive T-cell therapy, both of which are now being tested in clinical trials for various malignancies. The goal of this review is to outline the use of neoantigens as cancer therapy targets, with an emphasis on neoantigen identification, clinical usage of personalized neoantigen-based cancer therapy agents, and the development of off-the-shelf products based on shared neoantigens. In addition, we introduce and discuss the potential impact of the neoantigen-MHC complex on natural killer (NK) cell antitumor function, which could be a novel way to boost immune response-induced cytotoxicity against malignancies.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesNeoplasmsAntigens, NeoplasmHumansImmunotherapyKiller Cells, NaturalAntigens, NeoplasmCancer Vaccinesadoptive T cell therapycancer vaccineneoantigenNK cellT cell

Identifiers

PMID35874694
PMCPMC9302773
OpenAlexW4284890913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.