Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35874623›Full record

ReviewCurrent epidemiology reports2022

Synthetic Control Methodology for Examining Firearm Policy.

Michelle Degli Esposti, Douglas Wiebe, Elinore Kaufman, Carl Bonander

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current epidemiology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. State-Level Firearm Laws and Firearm Homicide in US Cities: Heterogenous Associations by City Characteristics.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michelle Degli EspostiPenn Injury Science Center, University of Pennsylvania, Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Dr, Room 902, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0068-5754
Douglas WiebePenn Injury Science Center, University of Pennsylvania, Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Dr, Room 902, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021 USA.
Elinore KaufmanPenn Injury Science Center, University of Pennsylvania, Blockley Hall, 423 Guardian Dr, Room 902, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6021 USA.
Carl BonanderHealth Economics and Policy, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Firearm policies have the potential to alleviate the public health burden of firearm violence, yet it is unclear which policies are effective. The current review aims to summarize studies that use synthetic control methods to overcome previous methodological limitations when examining the impacts of firearm policies. Recent Findings: Evidence from studies using synthetic control methods find compelling evidence that purchasing licensing laws for all individuals (e.g., permit-to-purchase) have a preventive effect on firearm deaths. Otherwise, the effects of other firearm policies targeting firearm availability, ownership, sales, and use varied across studies and contexts. Summary: Synthetic control evaluations find heterogenous effects of firearm policies, suggesting that previous inconsistent findings might reflect their varying impacts across regions rather than methodological limitations alone. Future research should aim to exploit the complementary biases of synthetic control methods to triangulate evidence across evaluation approaches and understand why firearm policies have differential impacts.

Indexed as

Evaluation methodsFirearm lawFirearm policySynthetic control methodology

Identifiers

PMID35874623
PMCPMC9295100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.