Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35874585›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Gastric Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Acutely and Critically Ill Children (POCUS-ped): A Scoping Review.

Frederic V Valla, Lyvonne N Tume, Corinne Jotterand Chaparro, Philip Arnold, Walid Alrayashi, Claire Morice, Tomasz Nabialek, Aymeric Rouchaud, Eloise Cercueil, Lionel Bouvet

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Frederic V VallaPediatric Intensive Care, Lyon University Children Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Lyvonne N TumeSchool of Health and Society, University of Salford, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Corinne Jotterand ChaparroDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland.
Philip ArnoldDepartment of Anaesthetics, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Walid AlrayashiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Claire MoricePediatric Intensive Care, Lyon University Children Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Tomasz NabialekPediatric Intensive Care, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Aymeric RouchaudPediatric Radiology Department, Lyon University Children Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Eloise CercueilPediatric Intensive Care, Lyon University Children Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Lionel BouvetDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lyon University Children Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Hospices Civils de Lyon · FRAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust · GBHarvard University · USHES-SO Genève · CHRoyal Children's Hospital · AUUniversity of Salford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use is increasing in pediatric clinical settings. However, gastric POCUS is rarely used, despite its potential value in optimizing the diagnosis and management in several clinical scenarios (i.e., assessing gastric emptying and gastric volume/content, gastric foreign bodies, confirming nasogastric tube placement, and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis). This review aimed to assess how gastric POCUS may be used in acute and critically ill children. Materials and Methods: An international expert group was established, composed of pediatricians, pediatric intensivists, anesthesiologists, radiologists, nurses, and a methodologist. A scoping review was conducted with an aim to describe the use of gastric POCUS in pediatrics in acute and critical care settings. A literature search was conducted in three databases, to identify studies published between 1998 and 2022. Abstracts and relevant full texts were screened for eligibility, and data were extracted, according to the JBI methodology (Johanna Briggs Institute). Results: A total of 70 studies were included. Most studies ( Discussion: Gastric POCUS appears useful and reliable in a variety of pediatric clinical settings. It may help optimize induction in emergency sedation/anesthesia, diagnose foreign bodies and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, and assist in confirming nasogastric tube placement, avoiding delays in obtaining confirmatory examinations (RADUS, x-rays, etc.) and reducing radiation exposure. It may be useful in pediatric intensive care but requires further investigation.

Indexed as

foreign bodygastric insufflationhypertrophic pyloric stenosisnasogastric tubepediatric anesthesiapediatric emergencypediatric intensive carePOCUS

Identifiers

PMID35874585
PMCPMC9298849
OpenAlexW4286630491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.