Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35874558›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

The Prevalence of Social Withdrawal in Infants With Cleft Lip and Palate: The Feasibility of the Full and the Modified Versions of the Alarm Distress Baby Scale.

Carla Pérez Martínez, Bruno Grollemund, Pascale Gavelle, Sylvie Viaux-Savelon, Antoine Guedeney

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00993993 (Relational Development in Children With Cleft Lips and Palates), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00993993 completednot on this map

Relational Development in Children With Cleft Lips and Palates: Influence of the Waiting Period Prior to the First Surgical Intervention and the Parents' Psychological Perception of the Abnormality

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceRan2010 to 2013Enrolled150ConditionsCleft Palate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Carla Pérez MartínezPrivate Practice at Psicología con bebés, Oaxaca, Mexico.
Bruno GrollemundDepartment of Dental-Facial Orthopedia, Pole of Bucco Dentaries' Medicine and Surgery, Cleft Competence Center, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
Pascale GavelleDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery and Plastic Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Paris, France.
Sylvie Viaux-SavelonDepartment of Neonatology an Obstetric, University Lyon 1 and University Hospital Croix Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Lyon, France.
Antoine GuedeneyDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Université de Paris and Bichat Claude Bernard Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP) Hôpital, Paris, France.
Hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard · FRHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRInstituto Tecnológico de Oaxaca · MXUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité de Strasbourg · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Social withdrawal is a risk indicator for infant development with both organic and non-organic causes. Cleft lip and palate (CLP) impose a higher risk of physical and emotional distress in infants and alters parent-infant relationships. The ADBB scale is a screening tool to identify social withdrawal as a sign of distress in infants. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of social withdrawal behavior in infants with CLP using the full 8-item ADBB scale and the modified 5-item ADBB scale, and to examine the feasibility of both scales. Methods: 145 infants with Cleft Lip and Palate were enrolled and video recorded during a pediatric consultation. All infants were scored by two expert raters trained in ADBB scale, and subsequently scored with the m-ADBB by an independent expert. We measured the interrater agreement for the full ADBB scale and psychometric properties of both scales. Results: The full ADBB scale identified 15.9% of infants as having social withdrawal behavior (score above cutoff ≥5). Among the infants evaluated with the m-ADBB scale, 44.9% had a score above the suggested cutoff (≥2). For both scales, the item "vocalization" showed the higher scores. We found a good internal consistency for the full ADBB (Cronbach's alpha = 0.82) and an acceptable internal consistency for the modified ADBB (Cronbach's alpha = 0.71). The interrater agreement for the full ADBB scale was excellent (kappa = 0.837). The Spearman correlation coefficient between the total scores of the two versions was 0.88 ( Conclusion: Our results indicate a relatively high prevalence of social withdrawal in infants with Cleft Lip and Palate, especially evaluated with the modified 5-item ADBB scale. We found that the full ADBB and the modified ADBB scales are feasible to use as screening tools of social withdrawal in this population. Clinical Trial Registration: This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT00993993. The data is the property of

Indexed as

ADBB scaleCleft Lip and Palateinfant developmentm-ADBBsocial withdrawal

Identifiers

PMID35874558
PMCPMC9301039
OpenAlexW4284896284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.