Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35874117›Full record

ArticleWIREs. Water2021

The application of metacommunity theory to the management of riverine ecosystems.

Christopher J Patrick, Kurt E Anderson, Brown L Brown, Charles P Hawkins, Anya Metcalfe, Parsa Saffarinia, Tadeu Siqueira, Christopher M Swan, Jonathan D Tonkin, Lester L Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in WIREs. Water, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Keystone communities can rescue aquatic metacommunities influenced by pesticide contamination.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Species interactions and eco-evolutionary dynamics of dispersal: the diversity dependence of dispersal.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christopher J PatrickDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, 1370 Greate Rd., Gloucester Point, VA 23062.ORCID 0000-0002-9581-8168
Kurt E AndersonDepartment of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, 900 University Ave., University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0773-3779
Brown L BrownDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, USA.
Charles P HawkinsDepartment of Watershed Sciences, Ecology Center, and National Aquatic Monitoring Center, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.
Anya MetcalfeUnited States Geological Survey, Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center, 2255 North Gemini Drive, Flagstaff, AZ 86001.
Parsa SaffariniaDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Tadeu SiqueiraInstitute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Av. 24A 1515, Rio Claro, São Paulo 13506-900 Brazil.
Christopher M SwanUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA.
Jonathan D TonkinSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.
Lester L YuanUnited States Environmental Protection Agency - Office of Water.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

River managers strive to use the best available science to sustain biodiversity and ecosystem function. To achieve this goal requires consideration of processes at different scales. Metacommunity theory describes how multiple species from different communities potentially interact with local-scale environmental drivers to influence population dynamics and community structure. However, this body of knowledge has only rarely been used to inform management practices for river ecosystems. In this paper, we present a conceptual model outlining how the metacommunity processes of local niche sorting and dispersal can influence the outcomes of management interventions and provide a series of specific recommendations for applying these ideas as well as research needs. In all cases, we identify situations where traditional approaches to riverine management could be enhanced by incorporating an understanding of metacommunity dynamics. A common theme is developing guidelines for assessing the metacommunity context of a site or region, evaluating how that context may affect the desired outcome, and incorporating that understanding into the planning process and methods used. To maximize the effectiveness of management activities, scientists and resource managers should update the toolbox of approaches to riverine management to reflect theoretical advances in metacommunity ecology.

Indexed as

biomonitoringconservationdispersalinvasive specieslocal sortingnetwork connectivityrestorationspatial

Identifiers

PMID35874117
PMCPMC9301706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.