ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022
Grid Search for Lowest Root Mean Squared Error in Predicting Optimal Sensor Location in Protected Cultivation Systems.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing photovoltaic power plant forecasting with dynamic neural network structure refinement.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A genetic programming-based optimal sensor placement for greenhouse monitoring and control.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Irregular changes in the internal climates of protected cultivation systems can prevent attainment of optimal yield when the environmental conditions are not adequately monitored and controlled. Key to indoor environment monitoring and control and potentially reducing operational costs are the strategic placement of an optimal number of sensors using a robust method. A multi-objective approach based on supervised machine learning was used to determine the optimal number of sensors and installation positions in a protected cultivation system. Specifically, a gradient boosting algorithm, a form of a tree-based model, was fitted to measured (temperature and humidity) and derived conditions (dew point temperature, humidity ratio, enthalpy, and specific volume). Feature variables were forecasted in a time-series manner. Training and validation data were categorized without randomizing the observations to ensure the features remained time-dependent. Evaluations of the variations in the number and location of sensors by day, week, and month were done to observe the impact of environmental fluctuations on the optimal number and location of placement of sensors. Results showed that less than 32% of the 56 sensors considered in this study were needed to optimally monitor the protected cultivation system's internal environment with the highest occurring in May. In May, an average change of -0.041% in consecutive RMSE values ranged from the 1st sensor location (0.027°C) to the 17th sensor location (0.013°C). The derived properties better described the ambient condition of the indoor air than the directly measured, leading to a better performing machine learning model. A machine learning model was developed and proposed to determine the optimal sensors number and positions in a protected cultivation system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.