Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35873973›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Grid Search for Lowest Root Mean Squared Error in Predicting Optimal Sensor Location in Protected Cultivation Systems.

Daniel Dooyum Uyeh, Olayinka Iyiola, Rammohan Mallipeddi, Senorpe Asem-Hiablie, Maryleen Amaizu, Yushin Ha, Tusan Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel Dooyum UyehDepartment of Bio-Industrial Machinery Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.
Olayinka IyiolaSmart Agriculture Innovation Center, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.
Rammohan MallipeddiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, School of Electronics Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.
Senorpe Asem-HiablieInstitutes of Energy and the Environment, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Maryleen AmaizuCollege of Science and Engineering, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Yushin HaDepartment of Bio-Industrial Machinery Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.
Tusan ParkDepartment of Bio-Industrial Machinery Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irregular changes in the internal climates of protected cultivation systems can prevent attainment of optimal yield when the environmental conditions are not adequately monitored and controlled. Key to indoor environment monitoring and control and potentially reducing operational costs are the strategic placement of an optimal number of sensors using a robust method. A multi-objective approach based on supervised machine learning was used to determine the optimal number of sensors and installation positions in a protected cultivation system. Specifically, a gradient boosting algorithm, a form of a tree-based model, was fitted to measured (temperature and humidity) and derived conditions (dew point temperature, humidity ratio, enthalpy, and specific volume). Feature variables were forecasted in a time-series manner. Training and validation data were categorized without randomizing the observations to ensure the features remained time-dependent. Evaluations of the variations in the number and location of sensors by day, week, and month were done to observe the impact of environmental fluctuations on the optimal number and location of placement of sensors. Results showed that less than 32% of the 56 sensors considered in this study were needed to optimally monitor the protected cultivation system's internal environment with the highest occurring in May. In May, an average change of -0.041% in consecutive RMSE values ranged from the 1st sensor location (0.027°C) to the 17th sensor location (0.013°C). The derived properties better described the ambient condition of the indoor air than the directly measured, leading to a better performing machine learning model. A machine learning model was developed and proposed to determine the optimal sensors number and positions in a protected cultivation system.

Indexed as

air-vapor mixtureartificial intelligencegreenhousemachine learningpsychrometric propertiesRMSEtime-series big data

Identifiers

PMID35873973
PMCPMC9301965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.