Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35873808›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Multi-Coil MRI Reconstruction Challenge-Assessing Brain MRI Reconstruction Models and Their Generalizability to Varying Coil Configurations.

Youssef Beauferris, Jonas Teuwen, Dimitrios Karkalousos, Nikita Moriakov, Matthan Caan, George Yiasemis, Lívia Rodrigues, Alexandre Lopes, Helio Pedrini, Letícia Rittner and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Youssef Beauferris(AI)2 Lab, Electrical and Software Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Jonas TeuwenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Dimitrios KarkalousosDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Nikita MoriakovDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Matthan CaanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
George YiasemisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Lívia RodriguesMedical Image Computing Lab, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Alexandre LopesInstitute of Computing, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Helio PedriniInstitute of Computing, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Letícia RittnerMedical Image Computing Lab, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Maik DanneckerComputer Aided Medical Procedures, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Viktor StudenyakComputer Aided Medical Procedures, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Fabian GrögerComputer Aided Medical Procedures, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Devendra VyasComputer Aided Medical Procedures, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Shahrooz Faghih-RoohiComputer Aided Medical Procedures, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Amrit Kumar JethiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India.
Jaya Chandra RajuDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India.
Mohanasankar SivaprakasamDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India.
Mike Lasby(AI)2 Lab, Electrical and Software Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Nikita NogovitsynCentre for Depression and Suicide Studies, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Wallace LoosBiomedical Engineering Graduate Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Richard FrayneBiomedical Engineering Graduate Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Roberto Souza(AI)2 Lab, Electrical and Software Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep-learning-based brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction methods have the potential to accelerate the MRI acquisition process. Nevertheless, the scientific community lacks appropriate benchmarks to assess the MRI reconstruction quality of high-resolution brain images, and evaluate how these proposed algorithms will behave in the presence of small, but expected data distribution shifts. The multi-coil MRI (MC-MRI) reconstruction challenge provides a benchmark that aims at addressing these issues, using a large dataset of high-resolution, three-dimensional, T1-weighted MRI scans. The challenge has two primary goals: (1) to compare different MRI reconstruction models on this dataset and (2) to assess the generalizability of these models to data acquired with a different number of receiver coils. In this paper, we describe the challenge experimental design and summarize the results of a set of baseline and state-of-the-art brain MRI reconstruction models. We provide relevant comparative information on the current MRI reconstruction state-of-the-art and highlight the challenges of obtaining generalizable models that are required prior to broader clinical adoption. The MC-MRI benchmark data, evaluation code, and current challenge leaderboard are publicly available. They provide an objective performance assessment for future developments in the field of brain MRI reconstruction.

Indexed as

benchmarkbrain imagingimage reconstructioninverse problemsmachine learningmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Identifiers

PMID35873808
PMCPMC9298878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.