Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35873780›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Quantitative Analysis of Diffusion-Restricted Lesions in a Differential Diagnosis of Status Epilepticus and Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Lukas Machegger, Pilar Bosque Varela, Giorgi Kuchukhidze, Jürgen Steinbacher, Andreas Öllerer, Tanja Prüwasser, Georg Zimmermann, Slaven Pikija, Johannes Pfaff, Eugen Trinka and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Imaging of Status Epilepticus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lukas MacheggerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Pilar Bosque VarelaDepartment of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Member of the European Reference Network EpiCARE, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Giorgi KuchukhidzeDepartment of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Member of the European Reference Network EpiCARE, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Jürgen SteinbacherDepartment of Neuroradiology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Andreas ÖllererDepartment of Neuroradiology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Tanja PrüwasserDepartment of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Member of the European Reference Network EpiCARE, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Georg ZimmermannDepartment of Mathematics, Paris-Lodron University, Salzburg, Austria.
Slaven PikijaDepartment of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Member of the European Reference Network EpiCARE, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Johannes PfaffDepartment of Neuroradiology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Eugen TrinkaDepartment of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Member of the European Reference Network EpiCARE, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Mark Mc CoyDepartment of Neuroradiology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Paracelsus Medical University · ATUniversity of Salzburg · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Distinction between acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and status epilepticus (SE) on MRI can be challenging as restricted diffusion may occur in both conditions. In this study, we aimed to test a tool, which could help in differentiating AIS from SE when restricted diffusion was present on MRI. Materials and Methods: In diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) with a b-value of 1,000 and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, we compared the ratios of intensities of gray values of diffusion-restricted lesions to the healthy mirror side in patients with AIS and SE. Patients were recruited prospectively between February 2019 and October 2021. All patients underwent MRI and EEG within the first 48 h of symptom onset. Results: We identified 26 patients with SE and 164 patients with AIS. All patients had diffusion-restricted lesions with a hyperintensity in DWI and ADC signal decrease. Diffusion restriction was significantly more intense in patients with AIS as compared to patients with SE. The median ratios of intensities of gray values of diffusion-restricted lesions to the healthy mirror side for DWI were 1.42 (interquartile range [IQR] 1.32-1.47) in SE and 1.67 (IQR 1.49-1.90) in AIS ( Conclusion: Diffusion restriction and ADC decrease were significantly more intense in patients with AIS as compared to SE. Therefore, quantitative analysis of diffusion restriction may be a helpful tool for differentiating between AIS and SE when restricted diffusion is present on MRI.

Indexed as

acute ischemic strokediffusion restrictionMRIquantificationstatus epileptics

Identifiers

PMID35873780
PMCPMC9301206
OpenAlexW4284666479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.