Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35873756›Full record

ArticleMethods in ecology and evolution2022

The features and processes underpinning high-quality data generation in participatory research and engagement activities.

Phoebe R Maund, Jacob W Bentley, Gail E Austen, Katherine N Irvine, Robert Fish, Martin Dallimer, Zoe G Davies

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Phoebe R MaundDurrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE) School of Anthropology and Conservation University of Kent Canterbury UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6152-1254
Jacob W BentleyDurrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE) School of Anthropology and Conservation University of Kent Canterbury UK.
Gail E AustenDurrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE) School of Anthropology and Conservation University of Kent Canterbury UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6005-4869
Katherine N IrvineSocial, Economic and Geographic Sciences Department James Hutton Institute Aberdeen UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8860-2783
Robert FishDurrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE) School of Anthropology and Conservation University of Kent Canterbury UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7198-0403
Martin DallimerSustainability Research Institute School of Earth and Environment University of Leeds Leeds UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8120-3309
Zoe G DaviesDurrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE) School of Anthropology and Conservation University of Kent Canterbury UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0767-1467
University of Kent · GBJames Hutton Institute · GBUN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Participatory approaches are widely used by researchers to gather data and insight about how the environment is perceived, valued and used. The participatory activities may be creating information as part of curiosity-driven blue-skies research or to inform policy/practise decision-making.The quality and usability of data derived from participatory approaches are heavily influenced by how activities are conducted. We share a set of features and processes that underpin the generation of high-quality data, based on our collective experience of developing and undertaking participatory activities with an environmental and conservation focus.We propose four general features: (a) Depth and breadth of engagement; (b) robustness of the approach; (c) allowing space for surprises; (d) usability across contexts. We also provide a practical toolbox of processes, and associated facilitation techniques, which can be employed to maximise participant engagement and generate quality data.The features and processes are a practical guide for project leaders/teams to consider in the context of their work, rather than a set of inflexible rules. They should be relevant regardless of the participatory methods used, or the research, policy or practice setting being addressed.

Indexed as

conservationenvironmentinterdisciplinarypolicypracticequalitativesocial sciencetransdisciplinary

Identifiers

PMID35873756
PMCPMC9298020
OpenAlexW3207797303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.