Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35873705›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology2022

Domain-topic models with chained dimensions: Charting an emergent domain of a major oncology conference.

Alexandre Hannud Abdo, Jean-Philippe Cointet, Pascale Bourret, Alberto Cambrosio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Domain-topic models with chained dimensions: Charting an emergent domain of a major oncology conference.Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexandre Hannud AbdoLISIS, Université Gustave Eiffel, INRAE Marne-la-Vallée France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4849-4631
Jean-Philippe CointetSciences Po, médialab Paris France.
Pascale BourretAix Marseille Univ, Inserm, IRD, SESSTIM, ISSPAM Marseille France.
Alberto CambrosioDepartment of Social Studies of Medicine McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a contribution to the study of bibliographic corpora through science mapping. From a graph representation of documents and their textual dimension, stochastic block models can provide a simultaneous clustering of documents and words that we call a domain-topic model. Previous work investigated the resulting topics, or word clusters, while ours focuses on the study of the document clusters we call domains. To enable the description and interactive navigation of domains, we introduce measures and interfaces that consider the structure of the model to relate both types of clusters. We then present a procedure that extends the block model to cluster metadata attributes of documents, which we call a domain-chained model, noting that our measures and interfaces transpose to metadata clusters. We provide an example application to a corpus relevant to current science, technology and society (STS) research and an interesting case for our approach: the abstracts presented between 1995 and 2017 at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, the major oncology research conference. Through a sequence of domain-topic and domain-chained models, we identify and describe a group of domains that have notably grown through the last decades and which we relate to the establishment of "oncopolicy" as a major concern in oncology.

Identifiers

PMID35873705
PMCPMC9299004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.