ArticleDEN open2022
Potential for replacing warfarin with a direct oral anticoagulant for endoscopic mucosal resection in the colorectum: A multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial.
Article in DEN open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apixaban replacement (AR) as an alternative to heparin bridging (HB) in patients taking warfarin and scheduled for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in the colorectum. Methods: This trial was conducted at seven institutes in Japan between May 2016 and May 2018. Enrolled patients had been taking oral warfarin and were diagnosed within 3 months with colorectal polyps for which EMR was indicated. Patients were randomly assigned to receive HB or AR. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative bleeding. Secondary endpoints were the length of hospital stay, therapeutic endoscopy outcomes, and adverse events. Results: The planned sample size was 160 patients, but due to a decrease in the number of patients taking warfarin, the target number of cases could not be achieved within the case enrollment period, 44 cases were enrolled. They were divided into HB and AR groups. The incidence of postoperative bleeding was 15% (3/20) in HB and 0% in AR (P = 0.199). The total number of postoperative bleeding events was five in HB and none in AR. The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in AR than in HB (median: 3.0 vs. 13.5 days, Conclusion: AR for colorectal EMR may prove safe and has the potential to shorten hospital stay and reduce medical costs, though we were unable to evaluate the primary endpoint due to insufficient sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.