ArticleHealth science reports2022
A predictive model to estimate fever after receipt of the second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine: An observational cohort study.
Article in Health science reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic Mechanisms of Traditional Kampo Medicines in the Management of Mild COVID-19 through Gut Microbiota Modulation.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Review
- Trajectory analyses to identify persistently low responders to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective multicentre controlled study, J-COMBAT.Journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- A predictive model to estimate fever after receipt of the second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine: An observational cohort study.Health science reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Fever after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination is generally a mild and benign event, but can cause excessive anxiety in younger adults. This study aimed to find key factors that include allergic diseases or physique that determine fever after vaccination. Methods: We conducted an observational cohort study in our hospital to assess post-COVID-19 vaccination fever from April to June 2021. A total of 153 medical personnel aged 22-86 years of age were involved in the study to receive two doses, intramuscularly 21 days apart, of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (30 μg per dose). Vaccination records were taken more than 72 h after vaccination. Clinical and laboratory variables (age, sex, allergy history, weight, height, serum hemoglobin concentration, and these derivatives) were examined by multivariable logistic regression analysis using the peak axillary temperature in the 4-day period after the second vaccination as a dependent variable. Results: No serious safety problems were detected. The incidence of a postsecond vaccination fever of 37.3°C or above was 29.4%. Logistic regression analysis found age, history of perennial allergic rhinitis, body surface area, body weight, percent overweight, and serum hemoglobin concentration as independent predictors of postvaccination fever. The characteristics of this individual were incorporated into the numerical model of human thermoregulation. The evaluation of this model had a sensitivity of 66.1% and a specificity of 90.7% in the detection of postvaccination fever. The multiple coefficient of determination ( Conclusion: The COVID-19 vaccine induced higher rates of fever during the 4-day period after the second vaccination. Younger age, part of the allergy history, small and light body, and concentrated blood were associated with postvaccination fever.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.