Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35873384›Full record

Trial reportJournal of inflammation research2022

The Beneficial Effects of Hydrogen-Rich Saline Irrigation on Chronic Rhinitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Ling Jin, Kai Fan, Shiwang Tan, Shangxi Liu, Qin Ge, Yang Wang, Zisheng Ai, Shaoqing Yu

Open access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of inflammation research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Research Progress of Molecular HDrug design, development and therapy · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Molecular Hydrogen in the Treatment of Respiratory Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Research Progress of Hydrogen on Chronic Nasal Inflammation.Journal of inflammation research · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ling Jin *Department of Otolaryngology, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200065, People's Republic of China.
Kai Fan *Department of Otolaryngology, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200065, People's Republic of China.
Shiwang TanDepartment of Otolaryngology, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200065, People's Republic of China.
Shangxi LiuDepartment of Otolaryngology, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200065, People's Republic of China.
Qin GeDepartment of Otolaryngology, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200065, People's Republic of China.
Yang WangDepartment of Otolaryngology, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200065, People's Republic of China.
Zisheng AiDepartment of Medical Statistics, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200331, People's Republic of China.
Shaoqing YuDepartment of Otolaryngology, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200065, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-2208-4535
Tongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Chronic rhinitis (CR) is a common chronic inflammation of the nasal mucosa. Nasal saline irrigation has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for CR. In this study, we investigated the beneficial effects of hydrogen-rich saline irrigation as an anti-inflammatory irrigation therapy for CR and compared its effectiveness over saline irrigation. Hydrogen-rich saline (HRS) was investigated due to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Methods: A total of 120 patients with CR were randomly divided into two groups, patients irrigated with HR (HRS group) and the control group irrigated with saline (NS group). A randomized, double-blind control study was performed. The main observation index in this study was the total score of nasal symptoms (TNSS). In addition, eosinophilic protein (ECP) of the nasal secretions, nasal nitric oxide (nNO) levels, and levels of regulatory T cells (Treg) and regulatory B cells (Breg) were also compared between the two groups. Furthermore, patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) and non-allergic rhinitis (NAR) were also evaluated based on serum-specific IgE positivity. Results: After treatment, TNSS and nasal ECP in the two groups decreased significantly (P<0.05), with patients in the HRS group showing significantly lower levels compared to the NS group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in Treg and Breg levels between the two groups. Subgroup analysis showed that TNSS in the AR-HRS group showed a more significant reduction compared to the AR-NS group (P<0.05); however, there were no significant differences for the other inflammatory biomarkers (P>0.05). ECP levels were reduced significantly in the NAR subgroup compared to NS irrigation (P<0.05). There were no obvious adverse events observed in patients during the entire treatment period. Conclusion: Compared to saline irrigation, HRS nasal irrigation was found to improve CR clinical symptoms, especially in patients with AR. HRS could effectively be used for the clinical treatment of patients with CR.

Indexed as

allergic rhinitischronic rhinitishydrogen-richnasal irrigationnon-allergic rhinitis

Identifiers

PMID35873384
PMCPMC9296884
OpenAlexW4285405504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.