ArticleClinical practice in pediatric psychology2022
Uncovering Key Elements of an Executive Functioning Intervention in Adolescents: Epilepsy Journey.
Article in Clinical practice in pediatric psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02925663 (Web-based Intervention to Improve Executive Functioning in Teens With Epilepsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Web-based Intervention to Improve Executive Functioning in Teens With Epilepsy (Epilepsy Journey)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intervention to reduce barriers to type 1 diabetes self-management: Diabetes Journey study design and participant characteristics.Contemporary clinical trials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: The extent to which tailored executive functioning (EF) interventions lead to improvements in other areas of functioning in adolescents with epilepsy is unknown. The types of problems that youth select to practice EF skills during tailored interventions has not been documented. This study aimed to systematically evaluate: 1) the EF problems and strategies selected during a tailored EF intervention for youth with epilepsy, and 2) impact of a tailored intervention on specific problems for subgroups who choose to practice EF skills in those areas. Method: We conducted secondary data analyses of a proof-of-concept clinical trial of a tailored web-based EF intervention for youth with epilepsy. Baseline and 2-months post-intervention questionnaire data were included. A coding system was developed to identify the problem domains that adolescents targeted during treatment. Descriptive statistics and paired sample t-tests were used to examine whether adolescents who identified specific EF problems improved on specific domains. Results: Coding revealed eight domains: Academics, Activities of Daily Living, Family, Social, Adherence, Healthy Habits/Self-care, Sleep, and Emotion/Stress. Significant improvements were noted on "Academics," "Emotion/Stress," and "Sleep" domains for those who applied EF skills to those domains. Conclusions: Tailored EF interventions such as Epilepsy Journey are related not only to improvements in broad EF skills, but also to improvements across areas of functioning that adolescents identify as important. Clinically, EF skills may be more effectively learned when adolescents directly apply EF skills to the problems they identify as most salient.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02925663.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.