Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35873352›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology research and practice2022

Effects of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma on Healing of Peptic Ulcers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ting Xu, Yin Tian, Yi Wang, Zhongmei Yi, Chenchen Li, Shichun Wang, Yahan Fan, Chunyan Yao, Guiyong Peng, Hua Lu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ting XuDepartment of Blood Transfusion, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Yin TianDepartment of Gastroenterology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Yi WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Zhongmei YiDepartment of Blood Transfusion, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Chenchen LiDepartment of Blood Transfusion, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Shichun WangDepartment of Blood Transfusion, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Yahan FanDepartment of Blood Transfusion, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Chunyan YaoDepartment of Blood Transfusion, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Guiyong PengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6007-9481
Hua LuDepartment of Blood Transfusion, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0468-0862
Army Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Peptic ulcer is a multifactorial and complex disease and affects a wide range of people worldwide. We provided a novel therapeutic approach for peptic ulcer and observed its effect. Methods: Peptic ulcer patients were enrolled from 2016 to 2017 in Chongqing and randomly assigned to two groups: a control group that used only rabeprazole and a platelet-rich plasma (PRP) group that received a combination therapy of autologous PRP (aPRP) and rabeprazole. The therapeutic effect was assessed via the ulcer size and symptom score. Results: A total of 27 patients were included (12 patients in the control group and 15 patients in the PRP group) in this study. Our results showed that all participants have healed in 30 days, and there was no significant difference in healing time between the PRP group and the control group in different independent variables. However, regression analysis revealed that the healing time was 6.99 days shorter in the PRP group than that in the control group, and patients with higher symptom scores in the initial examination need more time to heal during treatment. Endoscopic results showed that the repaired ulcer in the PRP group was more similar to the normal gastric mucosa tissue than that the control group. Conclusion: This study showed an encouraging preliminary result that aPRP has a positive result in patients with peptic ulcer and seems to be a better choice for refractory peptic ulcer treatment. Although further follow-up studies are needed to determine the duration of efficacy of aPRP, the approach will be helpful in improving the clinical treatment of peptic ulcer.

Identifiers

PMID35873352
PMCPMC9307395
OpenAlexW4285592389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.