ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022
Anatomic Site-Specific Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Testing and Incidence Among People With HIV Engaged in Care at 4 US Clinical Centers, 2014-2018.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mpox in People With HIV: Predictors of Diagnosis, Outcomes, and Vaccine Effectiveness in a Multisite Cohort.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Article
- High Volume and High Positivity of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Tests by Anatomic Site From a Large National Laboratory in the United States, 2019 to 2023.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2025Article
- Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Incidence and Risk Factors Among People with HIV (PWH): Insights from a 13-Year Cohort Study in South Carolina.AIDS and behavior · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The incidence of Methods: We reviewed records of all PWH in care between January 1, 2014, and November 16, 2018, at 4 sites in the CFAR Network of Integrated Clinical Systems Cohort (CNICS; n = 8455). We calculated anatomic site-specific GC/CT testing and incidence rates and used Cox proportional hazards models modified for recurrent events to examine sociodemographic and clinical predictors of GC/CT testing and incidence at urogenital, rectal, and pharyngeal sites. We also calculated site-specific number needed to test (NNT) to detect a positive GC/CT test. Results: Of 8455 PWH, 2460 (29.1%) had at least yearly GC/CT testing at any anatomic site. The rates of urogenital, rectal, and pharyngeal GC were 1.7 (95% CI, 1.6-1.9), 3.2 (95% CI, 3.0-3.5), and 2.7 (95% CI, 2.5-2.9) infections per 100 person-years, respectively. The rates of urogenital, rectal, and pharyngeal CT were 1.9 (95% CI, 1.7-2.1), 4.3 (95% CI, 4.0-4.5), and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.8-1.0) infections per 100 person-years, respectively. PWH 16-39 years old experienced greater GC/CT rates at all anatomic sites, while men who have sex with men experienced greater rates of extragenital infections. NNTs for urogenital, rectal, and pharyngeal GC/CT were 20 (95% CI, 19-21), 5 (95% CI, 5-5), and 9 (95% CI, 8-9), respectively. Conclusions: Many PWH are not tested annually for GC/CT, and rates of GC/CT infection, particularly rates of extragenital infections, are high. We identified groups of PWH who may benefit from increased site-specific GC/CT testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.