Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35873284›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022

Receipt of Baseline Laboratory Testing Recommended by the HIV Medicine Association for People Initiating HIV Care, United States, 2015-2019.

John Weiser, Yunfeng Tie, Jen-Feng Lu, Jonathan A Colasanti, Robyn Neblett Fanfair, Linda Beer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John WeiserDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2310-5641
Yunfeng TieDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jen-Feng LuDLH Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jonathan A ColasantiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Infectious Diseases Program, Grady Health System, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Robyn Neblett FanfairDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Linda BeerDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USEmory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Disease Society of America publishes Primary Care Guidance for Persons with Human Immunodeficiency Virus. We assessed receipt of recommended baseline tests among newly diagnosed patients initiating HIV care. Methods: The Medical Monitoring Project is a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention survey designed to produce nationally representative estimates of behavioral and clinical characteristics of adults with diagnosed HIV in the United States. We analyzed data for 725 participants in the 2015-2019 data collection cycles who received an HIV diagnosis within the past 2 years and had ≥1 HIV provider visit. We estimated the prevalence of having recommended tests after the first HIV provider visit and between 3 months before and 3/6 months after the first HIV provider visit and estimated prevalence differences of having 4 combinations of tests by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Results: Within 6 months of care initiation, HIV monitoring tests were performed for 91.3% (95% CI, 88.7%-93.8%) of patients; coinfection blood tests, 27.5% (95% CI, 22.5%-32.4%); site-based STI tests, 59.7% (95% CI, 55.4%-63.9%); and blood chemistry and hematology tests, 50.8% (95% CI, 45.8%-55.8%). Patients who were younger, gay, or bisexual were more likely to receive site-based STI tests, and patients receiving care at Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHAP)-funded facilities were more likely than patients at non-RWHAP-funded facilities to receive all test combinations. Conclusions: Receipt of recommended baseline tests among patients initiating HIV care was suboptimal but was more likely among patients at RWHAP-funded facilities. Embedding clinical decision support in HIV provider workflow could increase recommended baseline testing.

Indexed as

baseline laboratory testingguidelinesHIVHIV Medicine Associationprovider

Identifiers

PMID35873284
PMCPMC9297314
OpenAlexW4282029953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.