ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022
Receipt of Baseline Laboratory Testing Recommended by the HIV Medicine Association for People Initiating HIV Care, United States, 2015-2019.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Disease Society of America publishes Primary Care Guidance for Persons with Human Immunodeficiency Virus. We assessed receipt of recommended baseline tests among newly diagnosed patients initiating HIV care. Methods: The Medical Monitoring Project is a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention survey designed to produce nationally representative estimates of behavioral and clinical characteristics of adults with diagnosed HIV in the United States. We analyzed data for 725 participants in the 2015-2019 data collection cycles who received an HIV diagnosis within the past 2 years and had ≥1 HIV provider visit. We estimated the prevalence of having recommended tests after the first HIV provider visit and between 3 months before and 3/6 months after the first HIV provider visit and estimated prevalence differences of having 4 combinations of tests by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Results: Within 6 months of care initiation, HIV monitoring tests were performed for 91.3% (95% CI, 88.7%-93.8%) of patients; coinfection blood tests, 27.5% (95% CI, 22.5%-32.4%); site-based STI tests, 59.7% (95% CI, 55.4%-63.9%); and blood chemistry and hematology tests, 50.8% (95% CI, 45.8%-55.8%). Patients who were younger, gay, or bisexual were more likely to receive site-based STI tests, and patients receiving care at Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHAP)-funded facilities were more likely than patients at non-RWHAP-funded facilities to receive all test combinations. Conclusions: Receipt of recommended baseline tests among patients initiating HIV care was suboptimal but was more likely among patients at RWHAP-funded facilities. Embedding clinical decision support in HIV provider workflow could increase recommended baseline testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.