Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35873219›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2022

Underrepresentation and undertreatment of women in hematology: An unsolved issue.

Kiera Liblik, Arkadeep Dhali, Vincent Kipkorir, Chaithanya Avanthika, Muhammad Romail Manan, Mihnea-Alexandru Găman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gender Equity Education in Oncology: A Survey Study of Hematology-Oncology Fellowship Program Directors.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. At the intersection of trust and mistrust: A qualitative analysis of motivators and barriers to research participation at a safety-net hospital.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Underrepresentation and undertreatment of women in hematology: An unsolved issue.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kiera LiblikQueen's School of Medicine Kingston Ontario Canada.
Arkadeep DhaliInstitute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research Kolkata India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-2569
Vincent KipkorirDepartment of Human Anatomy and Physiology University of Nairobi Nairobi Kenya.
Chaithanya AvanthikaKarnataka Institute of Medical Sciences Hubli Karnataka India.
Muhammad Romail MananServices Institute of Medical Sciences Lahore Pakistan.
Mihnea-Alexandru GămanFaculty of Medicine "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7133-8875

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gender disparity is pervasive and persisting in research. Despite gender being recognized as one of the primary determinants of health, inadequate representation of women in clinical trials has resulted in a deficit pertaining to equity in health care. This gross underrepresentation has exposed women to unforeseen health-related outcomes, and as evident through historic records, unequal distribution of opportunities has further widened this gender gap in health care.

Indexed as

femalegender identityhematologyunderrepresentationwomen's health

Identifiers

PMID35873219
PMCPMC9301474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.