Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35873149›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022

Acaricides Resistance in Ticks: Selection, Diagnosis, Mechanisms, and Mitigation.

Muhammad Kashif Obaid, Nabila Islam, Abdulaziz Alouffi, Alam Zeb Khan, Itabajara da Silva Vaz, Tetsuya Tanaka, Abid Ali

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
22.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Effects ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Acaricidal Effect of Essential Oils in the Control ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Muhammad Kashif ObaidDepartment of Zoology, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan.
Nabila IslamDepartment of Chemistry, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan.
Abdulaziz AlouffiKing Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Alam Zeb KhanDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Itabajara da Silva VazCentro de Biotecnologia and Faculdade de Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Tetsuya TanakaLaboratory of Infectious Diseases, Joint Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.
Abid AliDepartment of Zoology, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan.
Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan · PKKagoshima University · JPKing Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology · SAUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ticks are blood-feeding ecto-parasites that have a cosmopolitan distribution in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Ticks cause economic losses in the form of reduced blood, meat and dairy products, as well as pathogen transmission. Different acaricides such as organochlorines, organophosphates, formamidines (e.g. amitraz), synthetic pyrethroids, macrocyclic lactones, fipronil, and fluazuron are currently used sequentially or simultaneously to control tick infestations. Most acaricide treatments now face increasingly high chances of failure, due to the resistance selection in different tick populations against these drugs. Acaricide resistance in ticks can be developed in different ways, including amino acid substitutions that result in morphological changes in the acaricide target, metabolic detoxification, and reduced acaricide entry through the outer layer of the tick body. The current literature brings a plethora of information regarding the use of different acaricides for tick control, resistance selection, analysis of mutations in target sites, and resistance mitigation. Alternatives such as synergistic use of different acaricides, plant-derived phytochemicals, fungi as biological control agents, and anti-tick vaccines have been recommended to avoid and mitigate acaricide resistance. The purpose of this review was to summarize and discuss different acaricides applied for tick control, their mechanisms of action and resistance selection, genetic polymorphisms in their target molecules, as well as the approaches used for diagnosis and mitigation of acaricide resistance, specifically in

Indexed as

AcaricidesCattle DiseasesRhipicephalusTick InfestationsAnimalsCattleTick ControlAcaricidesacaricidesmitigationresistanceSNPsticks

Identifiers

PMID35873149
PMCPMC9299439
OpenAlexW4286632927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.