Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35873091›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2022

Analyzing Community Care Research Trends Using Text Mining.

Yoonseo Park, Sewon Park, Munjea Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yoonseo ParkDepartment of Bio Medial Engineering, Ajou University, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Sewon ParkDepartment of Medical Humanities and Social Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Munjea LeeDepartment of Medical Humanities and Social Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9781-4187

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study utilized text mining to analyze research trends around community care, which focuses on improving patients' quality of life by lessening the financial burden on caregivers and relieving patient discomfort. Methods: To examine research trends by community care stage, Section 1 is set from 2017 to 2019, when the community care was implemented, and Section 2 from 2020 to 2021, after the end of the community care. Papers used for the analysis were extracted using the Korea Citation Index (KCI); a total of 132 articles were selected and subjected to text mining analysis. Results: First, the main community care research areas included work, housing, economy, disability, and mind. Second, from 2017 to 2019, there was considerable interest in community care centered on households, and main keywords, such as nursing, family, and experience, appeared. Third, from 2020 to the present, there was high interest in community care centered on disabilities, and keywords, such as space, business, and Seoul City, appeared. Conclusion: The results reveal the changing issues, with the implementation of community care. Overall, research has tended to focus on social and welfare systems, rather than health and medical systems. In the future, local, community-integrated health and medical care systems should be restructured and regional delivery systems established to make them more accessible.

Indexed as

community careelderly careintegrated carelocal communitynetwork analysistext mining

Identifiers

PMID35873091
PMCPMC9297196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.