Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35873085›Full record

ArticleRemote sensing in ecology and conservation2022

Global application of an unoccupied aerial vehicle photogrammetry protocol for predicting aboveground biomass in non-forest ecosystems.

Andrew M Cunliffe, Karen Anderson, Fabio Boschetti, Richard E Brazier, Hugh A Graham, Isla H Myers-Smith, Thomas Astor, Matthias M Boer, Leonor G Calvo, Patrick E Clark and 39 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Remote sensing in ecology and conservation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

49 authors.

Andrew M CunliffeDepartment of Geography College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8346-4278
Karen AndersonEnvironment and Sustainability Institute University of Exeter Penryn UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3289-2598
Fabio BoschettiDepartment of Geography College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7612-3264
Richard E BrazierDepartment of Geography College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8715-0399
Hugh A GrahamDepartment of Geography College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9451-5010
Isla H Myers-SmithSchool of GeoSciences University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8417-6112
Thomas AstorGrassland Science and Renewable Plant Resources Organic Agricultural Sciences Universität Kassel Witzenhausen D-37213 Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4608-955X
Matthias M BoerHawkesbury Institute for the Environment Western Sydney University Penrith New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6362-4572
Leonor G CalvoBiodiversity and Environmental Management Department Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of León León Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3710-0817
Patrick E ClarkNorthwest Watershed Research Center USDA Agricultural Research Service Boise Idaho USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4299-1853
Michael D CramerDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0989-3266
Miguel S Encinas-LaraDepartment of Environmental and Water Sciences Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora Ciudad Obregón Sonora Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0541-3053
Stephen M EscarzagaDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Texas at El Paso El Paso Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7246-2795
José M Fernández-GuisuragaBiodiversity and Environmental Management Department Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of León León Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-3981
Adrian G FisherJoint Remote Sensing Research Program School of Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland 4072 Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6903-8053
Kateřina GdulováFaculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamýcká 129 Praha - Suchdol 165 00 Czechia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6943-9172
Breahna M GillespieBiology Department San Diego State University San Diego California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1464-3747
Anne GriebelHawkesbury Institute for the Environment Western Sydney University Penrith New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4476-8279
Niall P HananNew Mexico State University Las Cruces New Mexico USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9130-5306
Muhammad S HanggitoDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Texas at El Paso El Paso Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7275-9145
Stefan HaselbergerDepartment of Geography and Regional Research University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5702-4236
Caroline A HavrillaDepartment of Biological Sciences Northern Arizona University Flagstaff Arizona USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3913-0980
Phil HeilmanSouthwest Watershed Research Center USDA-Agricultural Research Service Tucson Arizona USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1073-4564
Wenjie JiNew Mexico State University Las Cruces New Mexico USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2554-4373
Jason W KarlDepartment of Forest, Rangeland, and Fire Sciences University of Idaho Moscow Idaho USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3326-3806
Mario KirchhoffDepartment of Physical Geography Trier University Trier Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8773-8005
Sabine KraushaarDepartment of Geography and Regional Research University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8849-8162
Mitchell B LyonsSchool of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences University of New South Wales Penrith New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3960-3522
Irene MarzolffDepartment of Physical Geography Goethe University Frankfurt am Main Frankfurt am Main Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0917-4336
Marguerite E MauritzDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Texas at El Paso El Paso Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8733-9119
Cameron D McIntireUniversity of New Mexico Albuquerque New Mexico USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9666-5805
Daniel MetzenHawkesbury Institute for the Environment Western Sydney University Penrith New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0330-8698
Luis A Méndez-BarrosoDepartment of Environmental and Water Sciences Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora Ciudad Obregón Sonora Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7467-5498
Simon C PowerDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6310-0146
Jiří ProšekFaculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamýcká 129 Praha - Suchdol 165 00 Czechia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9982-2730
Enoc Sanz-AblanedoGrupo de Investigación en Geomática e Ingeniería Cartográfica (GEOINCA) University of León Ponferrada Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9975-5726
Katherine J SauerDepartment of Natural Resources Sul Ross State University Alpine Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2153-8534
Damian Schulze-BrüninghoffGrassland Science and Renewable Plant Resources Organic Agricultural Sciences Universität Kassel Witzenhausen D-37213 Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8215-975X
Petra ŠímováFaculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamýcká 129 Praha - Suchdol 165 00 Czechia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2480-1171
Stephen SitchDepartment of Geography College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Exeter UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1821-8561
Julian L SmitGeomatics Division School of Architecture, Planning and Geomatics University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8664-8059
Caiti M SteeleNew Mexico State University Las Cruces New Mexico USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3480-3023
Susana Suárez-SeoaneDepartment of Organisms and Systems Biology (Ecology Unit) and Research Unit of Biodiversity (UO-CSIC-PA) University of Oviedo Oviedo Mieres Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7656-4214
Sergio A VargasDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Texas at El Paso El Paso Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0052-8580
Miguel VillarrealU.S. Geological Survey Western Geographic Science Center Moffett Field California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0720-1422
Fleur VisserSchool of Science and the Environment University of Worcester Worcester UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6042-9341
Michael WachendorfGrassland Science and Renewable Plant Resources Organic Agricultural Sciences Universität Kassel Witzenhausen D-37213 Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2840-7086
Hannes WirnsbergerDepartment of Geography and Regional Research University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1777-5067
Robert WojcikiewiczNew Mexico State University Las Cruces New Mexico USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8496-3514

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-forest ecosystems, dominated by shrubs, grasses and herbaceous plants, provide ecosystem services including carbon sequestration and forage for grazing, and are highly sensitive to climatic changes. Yet these ecosystems are poorly represented in remotely sensed biomass products and are undersampled by in situ monitoring. Current global change threats emphasize the need for new tools to capture biomass change in non-forest ecosystems at appropriate scales. Here we developed and deployed a new protocol for photogrammetric height using unoccupied aerial vehicle (UAV) images to test its capability for delivering standardized measurements of biomass across a globally distributed field experiment. We assessed whether canopy height inferred from UAV photogrammetry allows the prediction of aboveground biomass (AGB) across low-stature plant species by conducting 38 photogrammetric surveys over 741 harvested plots to sample 50 species. We found mean canopy height was strongly predictive of AGB across species, with a median adjusted

Indexed as

Canopy height modeldronefine spatial resolution remote sensingplant heightstructure‐from‐motion photogrammetryUAV

Identifiers

PMID35873085
PMCPMC9290598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.