ReviewEplasty2022
Reconstruction in Rhino-Orbito-Cerebral Mucormycosis Survivors: A Systematic Review.
Review in Eplasty, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health-related quality of life after prosthodontic rehabilitation in patients with COVID-19-associated mucormycosis: A systematic review.Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society · 2025Pooled it
- Post-COVID-19 Rhino-Orbito-Maxillary Mucormycosis Defect: Our Surgical Experience with Single Stage Delayed Reconstruction Using Free Flap.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2024Article
- Restoring Quality of Life: Assessing the Impact of Free Flap Reconstruction in Coronavirus Disease 2019-Associated Rhino-Orbital Mucormycosis Patients.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2023Article
- A case report on clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2023Review
- Surgical Rehabilitation of a Continuous Orbital and Maxillary Defect from Rhino-Orbital Mucormycosis Utilising Digital Technology - A Case Report.Annals of maxillofacial surgeryArticle
- Three-dimensional printed Patient-specific Implants for Reconstruction after Post-mucormycosis Maxillofacial Defects - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Annals of maxillofacial surgeryReview
- Survival from Rhino-Orbital-Cerebral Mucormycosis in SARS-CoV-2-Positive Diabetic Patients: Two Case Reports.Case reports in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the entire world tremendously. Particularly during the second wave in India, a dangerous complication followed in the form of COVID-19-associated mucormycosis. On June 7th, 2021, the Indian Union Health Minister stated that 28,252 cases of mucormycosis were reported from 28 states/Union territories in the country. Methods: A PubMed search was conducted for English-language studies published from 1988 through May 22, 2021 using the terms "reconstruction AND mucormycosis." Results: The search yielded 102 results. After excluding the articles not describing reconstruction in mucormycosis, 53 abstracts were screened. Then 34 articles dealing with reconstruction in non-ROC regions were excluded. The full text of 16 articles was reviewed. Additionally, 3 articles were identified from the reference search. Due to the aggressive debridements, rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis survivors may be left with complex tissue defects with significant functional and aesthetic impairments. It is essential to offer reconstructive solutions that improve their quality of life. As far as the timing of reconstruction is concerned, the consensus is in favor of delayed reconstruction after ensuring that the infection has been eliminated/controlled and that there are no recurrences. The most common defects encountered were the ones that resulted from orbital exenteration and excision of a varying extent of the involved contiguous bony and soft tissue structures. Reconstruction with pedicled flaps was preferred rather than free flaps, especially in the cases where the infection was not eliminated completely. Adjuvant antifungal therapy was used in most of the cases. Long-term follow-up was considered essential to detect and treat recurrences. Conclusions: A multitude of options are available for reconstruction in rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis including skin grafts, pedicled flaps, free flaps and in some cases implants and prosthetics. These can be utilized to give as much as functional and aesthetic restoration as possible to the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35873068PMC9275414W4288064314What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.