Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35873067›Full record

ArticleEplasty2022

Burden of Pressure Injuries: Findings From the Global Burden of Disease Study.

Charalampos Siotos, Andrew M Bonett, George Damoulakis, Adan Z Becerra, George Kokosis, Keith Hood, Amir H Dorafshar, Deana S Shenaq

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eplasty, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and other best practice recommendations for pressure injury risk assessment in the United States.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prophylactic Sacral Dressing in Prevention of Pressure Injury among ICU Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. L-PRF in extra-oral wound care.Periodontology 2000 · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Charalampos SiotosDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Andrew M BonettDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
George DamoulakisUniversity of Illinois in Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Adan Z BecerraDepartment of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
George KokosisDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Keith HoodDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Amir H DorafsharDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Deana S ShenaqDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pressure injuries remain among the most common problems faced by plastic surgeons and comprise a large portion of wound clinic practice. However, little is known about the overall morbidity related to the disease. This research sought to identify the burden related to the diagnosis of pressure injuries. Methods: We used the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 to extract information about incidence and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) related to pressure injuries from 1990 to 2017. Descriptive statistics were used to identify changes in the outcomes of interest. Results: A relative though not statistically significantly decrease in the incidence and burden of pressure injuries was observed between 1990 and 2017. Rates of incidence in the US appear higher than other higher socio-demographic index countries. No clinically and statistically significant changes were observed based on age or sex. Conclusions: Pressure injury incidence and burden have remained relatively stable between 1990 and 2017 with no significant improvement noted. There is room for improvement on a national performance level, and further research is needed regarding inconsistencies in regional outcomes.

Indexed as

burdenglobalincidencepressure injury

Identifiers

PMID35873067
PMCPMC9275412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.