Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35873035›Full record

ReviewGenes & diseases2022

Cancer genes and cancer stem cells in tumorigenesis: Evolutionary deep homology and controversies.

Vladimir F Niculescu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes & diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The evolutionary cancer gene network theory versus embryogenic hypotheses.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Vladimir F NiculescuKirschenweg 1, Diedorf 86420, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past, contradictory statements have been made about the age of cancer genes. While phylostratigraphic studies suggest that cancer genes emerged during the transitional period from unicellularians (UC) to early metazoans (EM), life cycle studies suggest that they arose earlier. This controversy could not be resolved. Phylostratigraphic methods use data from somatic tumor gene collections containing or lacking polyploidy genes (PGCC genes) and compare them to genes from evolutionary node taxa. I analyze whether the selected taxa are suitable to resolve the above contradiction or not. Both cancer and amoebae life cycles have a reproductive asexual germline that produces germline stem cells (GSCs) and somatic cell lines that cannot. When the germline loses its reproductive function, the soma-to-germ transition forms a new reproductive germline. The reproductive polyploidy of cancer is homologous to the reproductive polyploidy of unicellular cysts. PGCCs repair DNA defects, reorganize the involved genome architecture and produce new GSCs. The present study refutes the dogma of the early metazoan origin of cancer. Cancer has a unicellular life cycle that was adopted by early metazoans to rescue themselves from evolutionary dead ends. Early metazoans controlled the unicellular life cycle through suppressor and anti-suppressor genes that could suspend or reactivate it. They are the archetypes of tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes. Cells of mammalians and humans that reach a similar impasse as early metazoans can reactivate the conserved life cycle of unicellularians.

Indexed as

CancerCSCsEMTEntamoebaGene ageLife cyclePGCCPolyploidy

Identifiers

PMID35873035
PMCPMC9293697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.