Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35872899›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Native Valvular Regurgitation: A Comprehensive Review of Protocols, Grading of Severity, and Prediction of Valve Surgery.

Emmanuelle Vermes, Laura Iacuzio, Franck Levy, Yohann Bohbot, Cédric Renard, Bernhard Gerber, Sylvestre Maréchaux, Christophe Tribouilloy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Identifying Responders to Transcatheter Interventions for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Emmanuelle VermesDepartment of Cardiology, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Laura IacuzioDepartment of Cardiology, Center Cardio-Thoracique de Monaco, Monaco, Monaco.
Franck LevyDepartment of Cardiology, Center Cardio-Thoracique de Monaco, Monaco, Monaco.
Yohann BohbotDepartment of Cardiology, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Cédric RenardDepartment of Radiology, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Bernhard GerberDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Sylvestre MaréchauxDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Valve Center, Lille Catholic University Hospital, Lille, France.
Christophe TribouilloyDepartment of Cardiology, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRScientific Centre of Monaco · MCCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEUniversité Catholique de Lille · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Valvular regurgitation is common in developed countries with an increasing prevalence due to the aging of the population and more accurate diagnostic imaging methods. Echocardiography is the gold standard method for the assessment of the severity of valvular heart regurgitation. Nonetheless, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as an additional tool for assessing mainly the severity of aortic and mitral valve regurgitation in the setting of indeterminate findings by echocardiography. Moreover, CMR is a valuable imaging modality to assess ventricular volume and flow, which are useful in the calculation of regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction of mitral valve regurgitation, aortic valve regurgitation, tricuspid valve regurgitation, and pulmonary valve regurgitation. Notwithstanding this, reference values and optimal thresholds to determine the severity and prognosis of valvular heart regurgitation have been studied lesser by CMR than by echocardiography. Hence, further larger studies are warranted to validate the potential prognostic relevance of the severity of valvular heart regurgitation determined by CMR. The present review describes, analyzes, and discusses the use of CMR to determine the severity of valvular heart regurgitation in clinical practice.

Indexed as

cardiovascular magnetic resonanceechocardiographyregurgitant fractionregurgitant volumevalvular regurgitation

Identifiers

PMID35872899
PMCPMC9300884
OpenAlexW4284708925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.