ArticleBioMed research international2022
Lung Cancer Prediction from Text Datasets Using Machine Learning.
Article in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of Machine Learning (ML) and Mathematical Modeling (MM) in Healthcare with Special Focus on Cancer Prognosis and Anticancer Therapy: Current Status and Challenges.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Efficient lung cancer detection using computational intelligence and ensemble learning.PloS one · 2024Article
- Exploring the relationship between air quality index and lung cancer mortality in India: predictive modeling and impact assessment.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning AI Architectures in Detection and Classification of Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Retracted: Lung Cancer Prediction from Text Datasets Using Machine Learning.BioMed research international · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-08-02Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/F43332DAA8086154F8498209BA7D87
- Retracted
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer is the major cause of cancer-related death in this generation, and it is expected to remain so for the foreseeable future. It is feasible to treat lung cancer if the symptoms of the disease are detected early. It is possible to construct a sustainable prototype model for the treatment of lung cancer using the current developments in computational intelligence without negatively impacting the environment. Because it will reduce the number of resources squandered as well as the amount of work necessary to complete manual tasks, it will save both time and money. To optimise the process of detection from the lung cancer dataset, a machine learning model based on support vector machines (SVMs) was used. Using an SVM classifier, lung cancer patients are classified based on their symptoms at the same time as the Python programming language is utilised to further the model implementation. The effectiveness of our SVM model was evaluated in terms of several different criteria. Several cancer datasets from the University of California, Irvine, library were utilised to evaluate the evaluated model. As a result of the favourable findings of this research, smart cities will be able to deliver better healthcare to their citizens. Patients with lung cancer can obtain real-time treatment in a cost-effective manner with the least amount of effort and latency from any location and at any time. The proposed model was compared with the existing SVM and SMOTE methods. The proposed method gets a 98.8% of accuracy rate when comparing the existing methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.