ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Deep Learning Model for Predicting Intradialytic Hypotension Without Privacy Infringement: A Retrospective Two-Center Study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prediction of intradialytic hypotension by machine learning: A systematic review.Journal of nephrology · 2025Pooled it
- Transforming hemodialysis care: a tripartite collaboration model among medical staff, AI agents, and robots.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2026Review
- MI-Net: a dual-stream feature network based on Mamba-convolutional neural network (CNN) fusion to predict intradialytic hypotension using multimodal data.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Study on automatic detection of wheat spike grain number based on deep learning.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Intra-Session recurrence in intradialytic hypotension prediction: evaluation implications and recurrence-aware modeling.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Relationship Between Facial Hue and Blood Pressure Fluctuations in Hemodialysis Patients.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Life-Threatening Complications During Hemodialysis in Hospitalized Patients With Poor General Conditions.Artificial organs · 2026Article
- The BestShape artificial intelligence system for real-time prediction of intradialytic hypotension-clinical outcomes after four-year follow-up.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Nephrology: Clinical Applications and Challenges.Kidney medicine · 2025Review
- Construction and application of machine learning models for predicting intradialytic hypotension.PloS one · 2025Article
- Review
- Advances in Human-Centered Care to Address Contemporary Unmet Needs in Chronic Dialysis.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2024Review
- Wearables in Nephrology: Fanciful Gadgetry or Prêt-à-Porter?Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Prevention of Intradialytic Hypotension in Hemodialysis Patients: Current Challenges and Future Prospects.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Previously developed Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) prediction models utilize clinical variables with potential privacy protection issues. We developed an IDH prediction model using minimal variables, without the risk of privacy infringement. Methods: Unidentifiable data from 63,640 hemodialysis sessions (26,746 of 79 patients for internal validation, 36,894 of 255 patients for external validation) from two Korean hospital hemodialysis databases were finally analyzed, using three IDH definitions: (1) systolic blood pressure (SBP) nadir <90 mmHg (Nadir90); (2) SBP decrease ≥20 mmHg from baseline (Fall20); and (3) SBP decrease ≥20 mmHg and/or mean arterial pressure decrease ≥10 mmHg (Fall20/MAP10). The developed models use 30 min information to predict an IDH event in the following 10 min window. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) and precision-recall curves were used to compare machine learning and deep learning models by logistic regression, XGBoost, and convolutional neural networks. Results: Among 344,714 segments, 9,154 (2.7%), 134,988 (39.2%), and 149,674 (43.4%) IDH events occurred according to three different IDH definitions (Nadir90, Fall20, and Fall20/MAP10, respectively). Compared with models including logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost, the deep learning model achieved the best performance in predicting IDH (AUROCs: Nadir90, 0.905; Fall20, 0.864; Fall20/MAP10, 0.863) only using measurements from hemodialysis machine during dialysis session. Conclusions: The deep learning model performed well only using monitoring measurement of hemodialysis machine in predicting IDH without any personal information that could risk privacy infringement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.