Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35872755›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine Combined With Ropivacaine in Cesarean Section: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Study.

Qian Zhang, Ling-Yi Xia, Wei-Dong Liang, Ding-Yu Rao, Ping-Ping Zhu, Ke-Nv Huang, Zi-Hao Deng, Mao-Lin Zhong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Determination of Median Effective Concentration (ECDrug design, development and therapy · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qian ZhangFirst Clinical Medical College, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Ling-Yi XiaFirst Clinical Medical College, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Wei-Dong LiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ganna Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Ding-Yu RaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ganna Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Ping-Ping ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ganna Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Ke-Nv HuangFirst Clinical Medical College, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Zi-Hao DengFirst Clinical Medical College, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Mao-Lin ZhongDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ganna Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University · CNGannan Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to find the best dose of dexmedetomidine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Methods: 120 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class I and II parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated into four groups treated with intrathecal ropivacaine (12 mg) alone (Group R) or in combination with dexmedetomidine 5 μg (Group RD1), 7.5 μg (Group RD2) and 10 μg (Group RD3). Characteristics of spinal anesthesia, hemodynamic changes, adverse effects, stress reactions and neonatal outcomes were recorded in the four groups. Results: Patients in Group RD1, RD2, and RD3 had significantly longer sustained sensory and motor block time than patients in Group R. All four groups had comparable onset times of sensory and motor block. The time for the level of sensory block to lower to S1 was longer in Group RD1 (411.07 ± 106.66 min), Group RD2 (397.03 ± 125.39 min) and Group RD3 (468.63 ± 116.43 min) than in Group R (273.60 ± 88.34 min) ( Conclusion: Intrathecal 5μg of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine relieved intraoperative chills, did not increase intraoperative and postoperative adverse effects, did not increase the amount of intraoperative vasoconstrictor used, and reduced intraoperative stress reactions as well as prolonged the duration of maternal sensory and motor block, so this dose is appropriate for cesarean section. Clinical Trial Registration: [www.chictr.org.cn/], identifier [ChiCTR2200056052].

Indexed as

adverse effectscesarean sectiondexmedetomidineropivacainespinal anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID35872755
PMCPMC9301008
OpenAlexW4284895570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.