Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35872574›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2022

The DNA methylation landscape of the root-knot nematode-induced pseudo-organ, the gall, in Arabidopsis, is dynamic, contrasting over time, and critically important for successful parasitism.

Ana Cláudia Silva, Virginia Ruiz-Ferrer, Sebastian Y Müller, Clement Pellegrin, Patricia Abril-Urías, Ángela Martínez-Gómez, Almudena Gómez-Rojas, Eduardo Berenguer, Pilar S Testillano, Maria Fe Andrés and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ana Cláudia SilvaFacultad de Ciencias Ambientales y Bioquímica, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Área de Fisiología Vegetal, Avda. Carlos III, s/n, 45071, Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6113-9722
Virginia Ruiz-FerrerFacultad de Ciencias Ambientales y Bioquímica, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Área de Fisiología Vegetal, Avda. Carlos III, s/n, 45071, Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7840-297X
Sebastian Y MüllerDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.
Clement PellegrinDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6591-655X
Patricia Abril-UríasFacultad de Ciencias Ambientales y Bioquímica, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Área de Fisiología Vegetal, Avda. Carlos III, s/n, 45071, Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0677-5600
Ángela Martínez-GómezFacultad de Ciencias Ambientales y Bioquímica, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Área de Fisiología Vegetal, Avda. Carlos III, s/n, 45071, Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8920-4725
Almudena Gómez-RojasFacultad de Ciencias Ambientales y Bioquímica, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Área de Fisiología Vegetal, Avda. Carlos III, s/n, 45071, Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7397-4768
Eduardo BerenguerCentro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas, CIB-CSIC, Pollen Biotechnology of Crop Plants, Ramiro de Maeztu 9, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Pilar S TestillanoCentro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas, CIB-CSIC, Pollen Biotechnology of Crop Plants, Ramiro de Maeztu 9, 28040, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4509-7646
Maria Fe AndrésInstituto de Ciencias Agrarias (ICA, CSIC), Protección Vegetal, Calle de Serrano 115, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
Carmen FenollFacultad de Ciencias Ambientales y Bioquímica, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Área de Fisiología Vegetal, Avda. Carlos III, s/n, 45071, Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4653-6268
Sebastian Eves-van den AkkerDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.
Carolina EscobarFacultad de Ciencias Ambientales y Bioquímica, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Área de Fisiología Vegetal, Avda. Carlos III, s/n, 45071, Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9365-0851

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Root-knot nematodes (RKNs) induce giant cells (GCs) within galls which are characterized by large-scale gene repression at early stages. However, the epigenetic mechanism(s) underlying gene silencing is (are) still poorly characterized. DNA methylation in Arabidopsis galls induced by Meloidogyne javanica was studied at crucial infection stages (3 d post-infection (dpi) and 14 dpi) using enzymatic, cytological, and sequencing approaches. DNA methyltransferase mutants (met1, cmt2, cmt3, cmt2/3, drm1/2, ddc) and a DNA demethylase mutant (ros1), were analyzed for RKN resistance/tolerance, and galls were characterized by confocal microscopy and RNA-seq. Early galls were hypermethylated, and the GCs were found to be the major contributors to this hypermethylation, consistent with the very high degree of gene repression they exhibit. By contrast, medium/late galls showed no global increase in DNA methylation compared to uninfected roots, but exhibited large-scale redistribution of differentially methylated regions (DMRs). In line with these findings, it was also shown that DNA methylation and demethylation mutants showed impaired nematode reproduction and gall/GC-development. Moreover, siRNAs that were exclusively present in early galls accumulated at hypermethylated DMRs, overlapping mostly with retrotransposons in the CHG/CG contexts that might be involved in their repression, contributing to their stability/genome integrity. Promoter/gene methylation correlated with differentially expressed genes encoding proteins with basic cell functions. Both mechanisms are consistent with reprogramming host tissues for gall/GC formation. In conclusion, RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM; DRM2/1) pathways, maintenance methyltransferases (MET1/CMT3) and demethylation (ROS1) appear to be prominent mechanisms driving a dynamic regulation of the epigenetic landscape during RKN infection.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsTylenchoideaAnimalsDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesDNA MethylationGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant RootsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsArabidopsis ProteinsDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesMET1 protein, ArabidopsisProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsArabidopsisDNA methylation/epigenetics signaturesgallsgiant cellsMeloidogyne javanicasiRNAstomatotransposons

Identifiers

PMID35872574
PMCPMC9825882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.