Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35871769›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2022

A novel trophic cascade between cougars and feral donkeys shapes desert wetlands.

Erick J Lundgren, Daniel Ramp, Owen S Middleton, Eamonn I F Wooster, Erik Kusch, Mairin Balisi, William J Ripple, Chris D Hasselerharm, Jessica N Sanchez, Mystyn Mills and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Space-use by feral cattle and horses shapes vegetation structure in a trophic rewilding area.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Preventing extinction in an age of species migration and planetary change.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Erick J LundgrenCenter for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World (BIOCHANGE), Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9893-3324
Daniel RampCentre for Compassionate Conservation, TD School, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3202-9898
Owen S MiddletonSchool of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0813-6995
Eamonn I F WoosterCentre for Compassionate Conservation, TD School, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2907-4076
Erik KuschCenter for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World (BIOCHANGE), Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4984-7646
Mairin BalisiLa Brea Tar Pits and Museum, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6633-1222
William J RippleDepartment of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6557-3043
Chris D HasselerharmCenter for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World (BIOCHANGE), Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5580-5445
Jessica N SanchezOne Health Institute, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7689-0324
Mystyn MillsDepartment of Botany & Plant Sciences, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6775-8738
Arian D WallachCentre for Compassionate Conservation, TD School, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6640-3887
University of Technology Sydney · AUAarhus University · DKMuseum of Science · USOregon State University · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of California, Riverside · USUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduced large herbivores have partly filled ecological gaps formed in the late Pleistocene, when many of the Earth's megafauna were driven extinct. However, extant predators are generally considered incapable of exerting top-down influences on introduced megafauna, leading to unusually strong disturbance and herbivory relative to native herbivores. We report on the first documented predation of juvenile feral donkeys Equus africanus asinus by cougars Puma concolor in the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts of North America. We then investigated how cougar predation corresponds with differences in feral donkey behaviour and associated effects on desert wetlands. Focusing on a feral donkey population in the Death Valley National Park, we used camera traps and vegetation surveys to compare donkey activity patterns and impacts between wetlands with and without cougar predation. Donkeys were primarily diurnal at wetlands with cougar predation, thereby avoiding cougars. However, donkeys were active throughout the day and night at sites without predation. Donkeys were ~87% less active (measured as hours of activity a day) at wetlands with predation (p < 0.0001). Sites with predation had reduced donkey disturbance and herbivory, including ~46% fewer access trails, 43% less trampled bare ground and 192% more canopy cover (PERMANOVA, R

Indexed as

PumaAnimalsEcosystemEquidaeburrosferal equidsinvasive speciesmegafaunamountain lionspredationrewildingtrophic cascades

Identifiers

PMID35871769
PMCPMC10087508
OpenAlexW4287092404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.