Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35871759›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2022

Bayesian criterion-based assessments of recurrent event models with applications to commercial truck driver behavior studies.

Yiming Zhang, Ming-Hui Chen, Feng Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yiming ZhangDepartment of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
Ming-Hui ChenDepartment of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0003-1935-2447
Feng GuoDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia.ORCID 0000-0002-2572-481X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multitype recurrent events are commonly observed in transportation studies, since commercial truck drivers may encounter different types of safety critical events (SCEs) and take different lengths of on-duty breaks in a driving shift. Bayesian nonhomogeneous Poisson process models are a flexible approach to jointly model the intensity functions of the multitype recurrent events. For evaluating and comparing these models, the deviance information criterion (DIC) and the logarithm of the pseudo-marginal likelihood (LPML) are studied and Monte Carlo methods are developed for computing these model assessment measures. We also propose a set of new concordance indices (C-indices) to evaluate various discrimination abilities of a Bayesian multitype recurrent event model. Specifically, the within-event C-index quantifies adequacy of a given model in fitting the recurrent event data for each type, the between-event C-index provides an assessment of the model fit between two types of recurrent events, and the overall C-index measures the model's discrimination ability among multiple types of recurrent events simultaneously. Moreover, we jointly model the incidence of SCEs and on-duty breaks with driving behaviors using a Bayesian Poisson process model with time-varying coefficients and time-dependent covariates. An in-depth analysis of a real dataset from the commercial truck driver naturalistic driving study is carried out to demonstrate the usefulness and applicability of the proposed methodology.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingMotor VehiclesAccidents, TrafficBayes TheoremHumansMonte Carlo MethodBayesian model assessmentconcordance indexmultitype recurrent eventpenalized splinetruck driving safety

Identifiers

PMID35871759
PMCPMC9796651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.