Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35871712›Full record

ReviewPharmacological reports : PR2022

Oral antiviral treatments for COVID-19: opportunities and challenges.

Laila Rahmah, Sunny O Abarikwu, Amanuel Godana Arero, Mickael Essouma, Aliyu Tijani Jibril, Andrzej Fal, Robert Flisiak, Rangarirai Makuku, Leander Marquez, Kawthar Mohamed and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacological reports : PR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Discovery of benzyl carbamate inhibitors of coronavirus MJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Laila RahmahSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sunny O AbarikwuDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Port Harcourt, Choba, Nigeria.
Amanuel Godana AreroCardiac Primary Prevention Research Center, Cardiovascular Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mickael EssoumaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Aliyu Tijani JibrilDepartment of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Andrzej FalDepartment of Population Health, Division of Public Health, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Robert FlisiakDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Białystok, Białystok, Poland.
Rangarirai MakukuSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Leander MarquezCollege of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines.
Kawthar MohamedSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Lamin NdowNational Health Laboratory Service, Kotu, Gambia.
Dorota Zarębska-MichalukDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Nima RezaeiResearch Center for Immunodeficiencies, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Piotr RzymskiIntegrated Science Association (ISA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Poznań, Poland. rzymskipiotr@ump.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4713-0801
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversal Scientific Education and Research Network · IRJan Kochanowski University · PLMedical University of Białystok · PLPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLUniversité de Yaoundé I · CMUniversity of Port Harcourt · NGUniversity of the Philippines Diliman · PHWroclaw Medical University · PLZimbabwe AIDS Network · ZW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of antiviral COVID-19 medications can successfully inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication and prevent disease progression to a more severe form. However, the timing of antiviral treatment plays a crucial role in this regard. Oral antiviral drugs provide an opportunity to manage SARS-CoV-2 infection without a need for hospital admission, easing the general burden that COVID-19 can have on the healthcare system. This review paper (i) presents the potential pharmaceutical antiviral targets, including various host-based targets and viral-based targets, (ii) characterizes the first-generation anti-SARS-CoV-2 oral drugs (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir), (iii) summarizes the clinical progress of other oral antivirals for use in COVID-19, (iv) discusses ethical issues in such clinical trials and (v) presents challenges associated with the use of oral antivirals in clinical practice. Oral COVID-19 antivirals represent a part of the strategy to adapt to long-term co-existence with SARS-CoV-2 in a manner that prevents healthcare from being overwhelmed. It is pivotal to ensure equal and fair global access to the currently available oral antivirals and those authorized in the future.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsCOVID-19HumansSARS-CoV-2Antiviral AgentsAntiviralsClinical trialsPandemicPharmaceutical treatmentSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35871712
PMCPMC9309032
OpenAlexW4287009113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.