ArticlePsychological research2023
The network of the subjective experience in embodiment phenomena.
Article in Psychological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cooperative learning in anatomy: Comparing virtual avatars and human specimens.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Trial
- The Somatic Rubber Hand Illusion does not modulate perceived hand position in children with severe visual impairments.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Trust me, you are there: the role of verbal manipulation on embodiment and body localization.Psychological research · 2026Article
- The rubber hand illusion questionnaire: An exploratory graph analysis of ownership, referral of touch, and control statements.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Active self-touch restores bodily proprioceptive spatial awareness following disruption by 'rubber hand illusion'.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- I am where I believe my body is: The interplay between body spatial prediction and body ownership.PloS one · 2024Article
- From rubber hands to neuroprosthetics: Neural correlates of embodiment.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2023Review
- Visuo-Spatial Working Memory and Mathematical Skills in Children: A Network Analysis Study.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Look at me now! Enfacement illusion over computer-generated faces.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBody illusions are designed to temporarily alter body representation by embodying fake bodies or part of them. Despite their large use, the embodiment questionnaires have been validated only for the embodiment of fake hands in the rubber hand illusion (RHI).
methodsWith the current study, we aimed at (1) extending the validation of embodiment questionnaires to a different illusory situation e.g., the full-body illusion (FBI); (2) comparing two methods to explore the questionnaires structures: a classic exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a modern exploratory graph analysis (EGA). 118 healthy participants completed an FBI procedure where the subjective experience of embodiment was measured with a standard questionnaire.
resultsThe EFA results in two-factor structures. However, the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) fit indices do not show a good fit with the data. Conversely, the EGA identified four communities: ownership, agency, co-location and disembodiment; the solution was confirmed by a CFA. CONLCUSIONS: Overall, the EGA seems to be the best fitting method for the present data. Our results confirm the EGA as a suitable substitute for a more classical EFA. Moreover, the emerged structure suggests that the FBI induces similar effects to the RHI, implying that the embodiment sensations are common to different illusory methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.