ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2022
Response mechanism of Vibrio parahaemolyticus at high pressure revealed by transcriptomic analysis.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigating c-di-GMP Signaling in Vibrio parahaemolyticus: Biological Effects and Mechanisms of Regulation.Current microbiology · 2025Review
- Bioinformatics combined with machine learning unravels differences among environmental, seafood, and clinical isolates ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Tools to Enumerate and Predict Distribution Patterns of EnvironmentalMicroorganisms · 2023Review
- Response ofMarine life science & technology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a common pathogen in aquatic products, such as shellfishes. Laboratory-based simulated studies demonstrated that V. parahaemolyticus can tolerate high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) up to 20 MPa. However, the molecular mechanisms of high-pressure adaptation remain unclear. Herein, we analyzed the physiological changes and transcriptomic responses of V. parahaemolyticus ATCC 17,802 under HHP conditions to determine the possible survival mechanisms. Under HHP conditions, the morphology of V. parahaemolyticus was notably changed exhibiting the coccoid microbial cells. The transcriptome analysis revealed that there were 795 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) under the 20 MPa condition, including 406 upregulated DEGs and 389 downregulated DEGs. Most of the downregulated DEGs encoded proteins related to energy metabolism, such as citrate synthase (gltA), pyruvate kinase (pyk), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gapA). Many of the upregulated DEGs encoded proteins related to adhesion and virulence factors, such as RNA polymerase σ factor (rpoE), L-threonine 3-dehydrogenase, and bacterial nucleotide signal c-di-GMP (WU75_RS02745 and WU75_RS07185). In our proposed mechanism model, V. parahaemolyticus responds to HHP stress through RNA polymerase σ factor RpoE. These findings indicate that V. parahaemolyticus cells may adopt a complex adaptation strategy to cope with HHP stress. KEY POINTS: •The transcriptomic response of Vibrio parahaemolyticus under HHP conditions was studied for the first time. •V. parahaemolyticus may adopt a complex adaptation strategy to cope with HHP stress. •ToxRS and RpoE played an important role in sensing and responding the HHP signal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.