Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35871662›Full record

SynthesisPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2023

Inconclusive evidence that breathing shapes pupil dynamics in humans: a systematic review.

Martin Schaefer, Sylvia Edwards, Frans Nordén, Johan N Lundström, Artin Arshamian

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Frequency and State-Dependent Relationship between Pupil Size and Respiration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Dynamic Link between Respiration and Arousal.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Body and mind: how somatic feedback signals shape brain activity and cognition.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Martin SchaeferDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden. martin.schaefer@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0003-2942-9962
Sylvia Edwards *Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9891-0445
Frans Nordén *Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4987-1491
Johan N LundströmDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3529-8981
Artin ArshamianDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden. artin.arshamian@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0003-2282-5903
Karolinska Institutet · SEStockholm University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than 50 years ago, it was proposed that breathing shapes pupil dynamics. This widespread idea is also the general understanding currently. However, there has been no attempt at synthesizing the progress on this topic since. We therefore conducted a systematic review of the literature on how breathing affects pupil dynamics in humans. We assessed the effect of breathing phase, depth, rate, and route (nose/mouth). We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and conducted a systematic search of the scientific literature databases MEDLINE, Web of Science, and PsycInfo in November 2021. Thirty-one studies were included in the final analyses, and their quality was assessed with QualSyst. The study findings were summarized in a descriptive manner, and the strength of the evidence for each parameter was estimated following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The effect of breathing phase on pupil dynamics was rated as "low" (6 studies). The effect of breathing depth and breathing rate (6 and 20 studies respectively) were rated as "very low". Breathing route was not investigated by any of the included studies. Overall, we show that there is, at best, inconclusive evidence for an effect of breathing on pupil dynamics in humans. Finally, we suggest some possible confounders to be considered, and outstanding questions that need to be addressed, to answer this fundamental question. Trial registration: This systematic review has been registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration number: CRD42022285044.

Indexed as

PupilHumansBreathingHippusPhasePupil dynamicsPupil sizeRespiration

Identifiers

PMID35871662
PMCPMC9816272
OpenAlexW4287009107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.