Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35871428›Full record

SynthesisLa Radiologia medica2022

The impact of particle radiotherapy on the functioning of cardiac implantable electronic devices: a systematic review of in vitro and in vivo studies according to PICO criteria.

Amelia Barcellini, Veronica Dusi, Alfredo Mirandola, Sara Ronchi, Giulia Riva, Francesca Dal Mas, Maurizio Massaro, Viviana Vitolo, Mario Ciocca, Roberto Rordorf and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in La Radiologia medica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Electrical storm management in structural heart disease.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Amelia BarcelliniRadiation Oncology, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy.
Veronica DusiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute e Della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. veronica.dusi@unito.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2290-3126
Alfredo MirandolaRadiation Oncology, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy.
Sara RonchiRadiation Oncology, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy.
Giulia RivaRadiation Oncology, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy.
Francesca Dal MasDepartment of Management, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy.
Maurizio MassaroDepartment of Management, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy.
Viviana VitoloRadiation Oncology, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy.
Mario CioccaRadiation Oncology, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy.
Roberto RordorfCoronary Care Unit and Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Ester OrlandiRadiation Oncology, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of oncological patients who may benefit from proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) or carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT), overall referred to as particle radiotherapy (RT), is expected to strongly increase in the next future, as well as the number of cardiological patients requiring cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The management of patients with a CIED requiring particle RT deserves peculiar attention compared to those undergoing conventional photon beam RT, mostly due to the potential generation of secondary neutrons by particle beams interactions. Current consensus documents recommend managing these patients as being at intermediate/high risk of RT-induced device malfunctioning regardless of the dose on the CIED and the beam delivery method used, despite the last one significantly affects secondary neutrons generation (very limited neutrons production with active scanning as opposed to the passive scattering technique). The key issues for the current review were expressed in four questions according to the Population, Intervention, Control, Outcome criteria. Three in vitro and five in vivo studies were included. Based on the available data, PBT and CIRT with active scanning have a limited potential to interfere with CIED that has only emerged from in vitro study so far, while a significant potential for neutron-related, not severe, CIED malfunctions (resets) was consistently reported in both clinical and in vitro studies with passive scattering.

Indexed as

Defibrillators, ImplantablePacemaker, ArtificialElectronicsHumansProtonsRetrospective StudiesProtonsCarbon ion radiotherapyCardiac implantable electronic deviceImplantable cardioverter defibrillatorMalfunctionsPacemakerProton beam radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35871428
PMCPMC9508006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.