Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35871415›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2022

Profiling of Fusarium head blight resistance QTL haplotypes through molecular markers, genotyping-by-sequencing, and machine learning.

Zachary J Winn, Jeanette Lyerly, Brian Ward, Gina Brown-Guedira, Richard E Boyles, Mohamed Mergoum, Jerry Johnson, Stephen Harrison, Ali Babar, Richard E Mason and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genetic analysis of stripe rust resistance in the common wheat line Kfa/2*Kachu under a Chinese rust environment.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Zachary J WinnDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA. zjwinn@ncsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1543-1527
Jeanette LyerlyDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
Brian WardDepartment of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, 44691, USA.
Gina Brown-GuediraDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
Richard E BoylesPee Dee Research and Education Center, Clemson University, Florence, SC, 29506, USA.
Mohamed MergoumDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Jerry JohnsonDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Stephen HarrisonDepartment of Agronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA.
Ali BabarAgronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Richard E MasonSoil and Crop Sciences Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Russell SuttonAgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
J Paul MurphyDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, USA.
North Carolina State University · USUniversity of Georgia · USAgricultural Research Service · USClemson University · USColorado State University · USLouisiana State University · USTexas A&M University · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageMarker-assisted selection is important for cultivar development. We propose a system where a training population genotyped for QTL and genome-wide markers may predict QTL haplotypes in early development germplasm. Breeders screen germplasm with molecular markers to identify and select individuals that have desirable haplotypes. The objective of this research was to investigate whether QTL haplotypes can be accurately predicted using SNPs derived by genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS). In the SunGrains program during 2020 (SG20) and 2021 (SG21), 1,536 and 2,352 lines submitted for GBS were genotyped with markers linked to the Fusarium head blight QTL: Qfhb.nc-1A, Qfhb.vt-1B, Fhb1, and Qfhb.nc-4A. In parallel, data were compiled from the 2011-2020 Southern Uniform Winter Wheat Scab Nursery (SUWWSN), which had been screened for the same QTL, sequenced via GBS, and phenotyped for: visual Fusarium severity rating (SEV), percent Fusarium damaged kernels (FDK), deoxynivalenol content (DON), plant height, and heading date. Three machine learning models were evaluated: random forest, k-nearest neighbors, and gradient boosting machine. Data were randomly partitioned into training-testing splits. The QTL haplotype and 100 most correlated GBS SNPs were used for training and tuning of each model. Trained machine learning models were used to predict QTL haplotypes in the testing partition of SG20, SG21, and the total SUWWSN. Mean disease ratings for the observed and predicted QTL haplotypes were compared in the SUWWSN. For all models trained using the SG20 and SG21, the observed Fhb1 haplotype estimated group means for SEV, FDK, DON, plant height, and heading date in the SUWWSN were not significantly different from any of the predicted Fhb1 calls. This indicated that machine learning may be utilized in breeding programs to accurately predict QTL haplotypes in earlier generations.

Indexed as

FusariumChromosome MappingDisease ResistanceGenotypeHaplotypesHumansMachine LearningPlant BreedingPlant DiseasesQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID35871415
OpenAlexW4286792071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.