Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35871312›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Impact of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force lung cancer screening update on drivers of disparities in screening eligibility.

Kristin G Maki, Rajesh Talluri, Iakovos Toumazis, Sanjay Shete, Robert J Volk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Pack-Year Smoking History: An Inadequate and Biased Measure to Determine Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin G MakiDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2980-7118
Rajesh TalluriDepartment of Data Science, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.
Iakovos ToumazisDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3462-2137
Sanjay SheteDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7622-376X
Robert J VolkDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8811-5854
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USJackson Memorial Hospital · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2021, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) updated its recommendation to expand lung cancer screening (LCS) eligibility and mitigate disparities. Although this increased the number of non-White individuals who are eligible for LCS, the update's impact on drivers of disparities is less clear. This analysis focuses on racial disparities among Black individuals because members of this group disproportionately share late-stage lung cancer diagnoses, despite typically having a lower intensity smoking history compared to non-Hispanic White individuals.

methodsWe used data from the National Health Interview Survey to examine the impact of the 2021 eligibility criteria on racial disparities by factors such as education, poverty, employment history, and insurance status. We also examined preventive care use and reasons for delaying medical care.

resultsWhen comparing Black individuals and non-Hispanic White individuals, our analyses show significant differences in who would be eligible for LCS: Those who do not have a high school diploma (28.7% vs. 17.0%, p = 0.002), are in poverty (26.2% vs. 14.9%, p < 0.001), and have not worked in the past 12 months (66.5% vs. 53.9%, p = 0.009). Further, our analyses also show that more Black individuals delayed medical care due to not having transportation (11.1% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.001) compared to non-Hispanic White individuals.

conclusionsOur results suggest that despite increasing the number of Black individuals who are eligible for LCS, the 2021 USPSTF recommendation highlights ongoing socioeconomic disparities that need to be addressed to ensure equitable access.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHumansMass ScreeningPreventive Health ServicesRacial GroupsSurveys and Questionnairescancer screening eligibilitydisparitiesearly detectionhealth services researchlung cancer screening

Identifiers

PMID35871312
PMCPMC9972155
OpenAlexW4286801116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.