ArticleObesity surgery2022
Evaluation of Persistent Efficacy of Diabetes Remission and Decline of Cardiovascular Risk After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Preliminary 1-Year Study.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Early Results of Aesthetic Focused Bikini-Line Sleeve Gastrectomy and Standard Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Contemporary perspectives on metabolic surgery for type 2 diabetes: surgical techniques, outcomes, and complications.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Assessing the impact of bariatric surgery on cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis using OMICs data.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Review
- Analysis Using Various Models on the Effect of Metabolic Surgery on Cardiovascular Disease Risk in the Chinese Population with Obesity.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a relative safe procedure in bariatric surgery. However, relatively few studies had been assessed its comprehensive efficacies. In the current study, the efficacies of LSG were comprehensively explored on glycemic control and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduction.
methodsA total of 95 obese patients, who owned body mass index (BMI) of more than 35, were recruited. All of them primarily underwent LSG from 2014 to 2016. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remission was defined as levels of glycated hemoglobin (A1C) and fasting blood glucose (FBG) of less than 6.4% and 125 mg/dL, respectively. The further efficacies of LSG on CVD and coronary heart disease (CHD) risks were explored by using original- and recalibrated Framingham 10-year CHD risk scores and the other 3 well-established CVD risk prediction models.
resultsSystolic blood pressure (SBP), serum FBG, A1C, triglyceride (TG), BMI, and body weight showed significantly declined and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL) displayed twice higher than beginning level after LSG. The 71 of 95 patients with obesity were T2DM; 62 of them exhibited persistent DM remission until 1 year after LSG. Cardiovascular age, general cardiovascular risk (GCVR), and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk (ASCVD) also showed significant decrements after LSG. We also observed significant reductions in estimated CVD and CHD risks.
conclusionLSG resulted in a persistent T2DM remission and corrected metabolic abnormalities. Subsequently, LSG also benefits declined risks of CVD and 10-year CHD developments. LSG may be helpful for primary CVD care in obese patients with BMI of more than 35.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.