Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35871251›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2022

Acquisition and evolution of enhanced mutualism-an underappreciated mechanism for invasive success?

Min Sheng, Christoph Rosche, Mohammad Al-Gharaibeh, Lorinda S Bullington, Ragan M Callaway, Taylor Clark, Cory C Cleveland, Wenyan Duan, S Luke Flory, Damase P Khasa and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Min Sheng *College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
Christoph Rosche *Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Mohammad Al-GharaibehDepartment of Plant Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0001-9242-4262
Lorinda S BullingtonMPG Ranch Missoula, Florence, MT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4132-2762
Ragan M CallawayDivision of Biological Sciences and the Institute on Ecosystems, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
Taylor ClarkSt. Johns River Water Management District, Palakta, FL, USA.
Cory C ClevelandDepartment of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences, W.A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
Wenyan DuanCollege of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China.
S Luke FloryAgronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Damase P KhasaCentre for Forest Research and Institute for Integrative and Systems Biology, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
John N KlironomosDepartment of Biology, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Morgan McLeodMPG Ranch Missoula, Florence, MT, USA.
Miki OkadaDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Robert W PalDepartment of Biological Sciences, Montana Technological University, Butte, MT, USA.
Manzoor A ShahDepartment of Botany, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, India.
Ylva LekbergMPG Ranch Missoula, Florence, MT, USA. ylekberg@mpgranch.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1033-8032

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) OIA-1757351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil biota can determine plant invasiveness, yet biogeographical comparisons of microbial community composition and function across ranges are rare. We compared interactions between Conyza canadensis, a global plant invader, and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi in 17 plant populations in each native and non-native range spanning similar climate and soil fertility gradients. We then grew seedlings in the greenhouse inoculated with AM fungi from the native range. In the field, Conyza plants were larger, more fecund, and associated with a richer community of more closely related AM fungal taxa in the non-native range. Fungal taxa that were more abundant in the non-native range also correlated positively with plant biomass, whereas taxa that were more abundant in the native range appeared parasitic. These patterns persisted when populations from both ranges were grown together in a greenhouse; non-native populations cultured a richer and more diverse AM fungal community and selected AM fungi that appeared to be more mutualistic. Our results provide experimental support for evolution toward enhanced mutualism in non-native ranges. Such novel relationships and the rapid evolution of mutualisms may contribute to the disproportionate abundance and impact of some non-native plant species.

Indexed as

MycobiomeMycorrhizaePlant RootsPlantsSoilSoil MicrobiologySymbiosisSoil

Identifiers

PMID35871251
PMCPMC9561174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.