ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2022
A Maverick Review of Common Stem/Progenitor Markers in Lung Development.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several attempts have been made to reconstruct the whole lung using pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) to treat terminal stage diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD] and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [IPF], for which whole-organ transplantation is currently the only treatment option. The development of induced differentiation technologies has made it possible to regenerate lungs from the 'bottom-up' via stepwise protocols. Nonetheless, the earliest lung multipotent progenitors, namely lung primordial stem cells, have not been identified to date. Considering the intricate crosstalk network that regulates lung development, stepwise protocols to differentiate PSCs into lung progenitors have raised some key questions: (1) the heterogeneity of these induced progenitors, and (2) obtaining a high-purity population. One important strategy to overcome these hurdles is to identify relevant markers or factors that regulate the complex network in lung morphogenesis according to those erected in vivo and ex vivo experiments. For screening lung primordial stem cells, several markers are 'on the shelf', and this review explores the most common or substantiated candidates. We artificially divided these markers into positive selecting and negative limiting proximal or distal markers as well as early progenitor markers that can be used to identify lung primordial stem cell, which represents the earliest progenitor during lung morphogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.