Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35870923›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022

Patient subgrouping with distinct survival rates via integration of multiomics data on a Grassmann manifold.

Ali Alfatemi, Hong Peng, Wentao Rong, Bin Zhang, Hongmin Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ali AlfatemiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangdong, China.
Hong PengDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangdong, China.
Wentao RongDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangdong, China.
Bin ZhangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangdong, China.
Hongmin CaiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangdong, China. hmcai@scut.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient subgroups are important for easily understanding a disease and for providing precise yet personalized treatment through multiple omics dataset integration. Multiomics datasets are produced daily. Thus, the fusion of heterogeneous big data into intrinsic structures is an urgent problem. Novel mathematical methods are needed to process these data in a straightforward way.

resultsWe developed a novel method for subgrouping patients with distinct survival rates via the integration of multiple omics datasets and by using principal component analysis to reduce the high data dimensionality. Then, we constructed similarity graphs for patients, merged the graphs in a subspace, and analyzed them on a Grassmann manifold. The proposed method could identify patient subgroups that had not been reported previously by selecting the most critical information during the merging at each level of the omics dataset. Our method was tested on empirical multiomics datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas.

conclusionThrough the integration of microRNA, gene expression, and DNA methylation data, our method accurately identified patient subgroups and achieved superior performance compared with popular methods.

Indexed as

MicroRNAsNeoplasmsDNA MethylationGenomeHumansSurvival RateMicroRNAsCancer subtypesGrassmann manifoldMulti-omics dataPatients subgroupsPCASurvival rates

Identifiers

PMID35870923
PMCPMC9308936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.