Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35870919›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2022

Patient expectations of and experiences with a suicide risk identification algorithm in clinical practice.

Bobbi Jo H Yarborough, Scott P Stumbo, Jennifer L Schneider, Julie E Richards, Stephanie A Hooker, Rebecca C Rossom

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predicting Next-Day Passive Suicidal Ideation in At-Risk Youth.Suicide & life-threatening behavior · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Using transfer learning to improve prediction of suicide risk in acute care hospitals.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bobbi Jo H YarboroughKaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA. bobbijo.h.yarborough@kpchr.org.
Scott P StumboKaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA.
Jennifer L SchneiderKaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA.
Julie E RichardsKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, WA, Seattle, USA.
Stephanie A HookerHealthPartners Institute, MN, Minneapolis, USA.
Rebecca C RossomHealthPartners Institute, MN, Minneapolis, USA.
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USHealthPartners · USKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · US

Funding

Whose Depression Are We Measuring?: Considering the role of place on Black women’s depression outcomesU19MH121738 · NIMH · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI SIMON, GREGORY E. · 2019 to 2023
$10.6M
NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH121738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuicide risk prediction models derived from electronic health records (EHR) and insurance claims are a novel innovation in suicide prevention but patient perspectives on their use have been understudied.

methodsIn this qualitative study, between March and November 2020, 62 patients were interviewed from three health systems: one anticipating implementation of an EHR-derived suicide risk prediction model and two others piloting different implementation approaches. Site-tailored interview guides focused on patients' perceptions of this technology, concerns, and preferences for and experiences with suicide risk prediction model implementation in clinical practice. A constant comparative analytic approach was used to derive themes.

resultsInterview participants were generally supportive of suicide risk prediction models derived from EHR data. Concerns included apprehension about inducing anxiety and suicidal thoughts, or triggering coercive treatment, particularly among those who reported prior negative experiences seeking mental health care. Participants who were engaged in mental health care or case management expected to be asked about their suicide risk and largely appreciated suicide risk conversations, particularly by clinicians comfortable discussing suicidality.

conclusionMost patients approved of suicide risk models that use EHR data to identify patients at-risk for suicide. As health systems proceed to implement such models, patient-centered care would involve dialogue initiated by clinicians experienced with assessing suicide risk during virtual or in person care encounters. Health systems should proactively monitor for negative consequences that result from risk model implementation to protect patient trust.

Indexed as

MotivationSuicideSuicide PreventionAlgorithmsHumansQualitative ResearchSuicidal IdeationImplementationPatientQualitativeRisk prediction modelsSuicide prevention

Identifiers

PMID35870919
PMCPMC9308306
OpenAlexW4286715778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.