Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35870909›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2022

Operationalizing stakeholder engagement for gene drive research in malaria elimination in Africa-translating guidance into practice.

Lea Pare Toe, Bakara Dicko, Richard Linga, Nourou Barry, Mouhamed Drabo, Naima Sykes, Delphine Thizy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lea Pare ToeInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Bakara DickoMalaria Research and Training Center, Bamako, Mali.
Richard LingaUganda Virus Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda.
Nourou BarryInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Mouhamed DraboImperial College London, London, UK.
Naima SykesImperial College London, London, UK.
Delphine ThizyImperial College London, London, UK. delphine@thizyconsulting.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6325-8138

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1141988Open Philanthropy 0-77157Open Philanthropy 2016-161185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene drive mosquitoes are increasingly considered a potential transformational tool for vector control of malaria mosquitoes. As part of efforts to promote responsible research in this field, a number of guidance documents have been published by the World Health Organization, National Academies and expert groups. While virtually all recent guidance documents on gene drive research stress the importance of stakeholder engagement activities, no specific guidelines on implementing them have been established. Target Malaria, a not-for-profit research consortium developing a vector-control gene drive approach to eliminate malaria, has reflected on how its stakeholder engagement strategy translates engagement guidance documents into practice. The project analysed and addressed the tension between the context specificities and the international recommendations. The engagement strategy combines published recommendations for responsible gene drive research, information collected from the local context where the project operates and a set of principles guiding the choices made. This strategy was first developed during the early phases of the project's research, years ahead of any activities with gene drive mosquitoes in those countries of operations. These earlier activities, and their related engagement, allow the project to develop and adapt an engagement strategy appropriate for potential gene drive research in its field site countries. This paper offers a description of a stakeholder engagement strategy operationalization based on (1) adaptation to stakeholder preferences, (2) inclusiveness and (3) empowerment and accountability. The authors hope to offer concrete examples to support other projects with the development and implementation of their engagement strategies with particular attention to the co-development principle.

Indexed as

CulicidaeGene Drive TechnologyMalariaAfricaAnimalsHumansMosquito VectorsStakeholder ParticipationCo-developmentCommunity engagementGene driveGenetic approachesMalariaResponsible researchStakeholder engagementVector control

Identifiers

PMID35870909
PMCPMC9308116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.