Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35870908›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2022

Outcome and quality of life in obese patients underwent laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy.

Ahmed H Hussein, Abdullah El-Baaly, Waleed M Ghareeb, Khaled Madbouly, Haitham Gabr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. "Laparoscopic Appendectomy versus Open Surgery".JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
  7. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Is Superior in Patients with Higher Fat Thickness.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmed H Hussein *General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Abdullah El-Baaly *General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Waleed M Ghareeb *General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt. waleed.m.ghareeb@med.suez.edu.eg.
Khaled MadboulyColorectal Surgery Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Haitham GabrGeneral Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Suez Canal University · EGAlexandria University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough obesity is a popular reason for choosing laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) versus open appendectomy (OA), however, the question of whether there is a difference remains. Our goal is to investigate if there is a difference between OA and LA in obese patients.

methodsFifty-eight obese patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis according to ALVARDO score at department of surgery at Suez Canal university hospitals from March 2020 till August 2021 were included. The study participants were assigned in two groups LA and OA. This study aimed to comparing between LA and OA regarding intraoperative complications, length of hospital stays, post -operative pain, and rate of post-operative complications. Meanwhile, using SF-36 scoring questionnaire, the quality of life was compared between both groups.

resultsA total of 58 patients were included in the present study (LG = 29 patients and OG = 29 patients). The early post-operative complications (within 30 days after surgery) were significantly lower in the LA group (5 patients out of 29) than the OA (11 patients out of 29). Additionally, lower incidence of complications was noticed in the LA group (2 out of 29 patients) compared to OA (6 patients out of 29) beyond 30 days after operation. Patients with laparoscopic surgery had statistically significant higher overall quality of life scores (SF-36) (72 ± 32) compared to open surgery patients (66 ± 35) 2 weeks after operation.

conclusionThe laparoscopic procedure was associated with lower incidence of post operative complications. However, open appendectomy was superior for a shorter operative time. Laparoscopic approach is not only used for therapeutic purposes, but also it has a diagnostic role.

Indexed as

AppendicitisLaparoscopyAppendectomyHumansLength of StayObesityPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PainQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAppendicitisLaparoscopyObesityQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID35870908
PMCPMC9308293
OpenAlexW4286685108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.