ArticleMedical physics2022
Generation of synthetic megavoltage CT for MRI-only radiotherapy treatment planning using a 3D deep convolutional neural network.
Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic literature review: deep learning techniques for synthetic medical image generation and their applications in radiotherapy.Frontiers in radiology · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence applied to image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT): a systematic review by the Young Group of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (yAIRO).La Radiologia medica · 2024Pooled it
- Synthetic CT imaging for pelvic and abdominal MR-only radiotherapy: Clinical validation on a 1.5T MR-Linac.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- CycleGan-based kV-to-MV image translation for potential in vivo dosimetry application: concept proposal and cross-institutional validation.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Article
- Advancements in synthetic CT generation from MRI: A review of techniques, and trends in radiation therapy planning.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Review
- Enhancing Radiotherapy Workflow for Head and Neck Cancer with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMegavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) has been implemented on many radiotherapy treatment machines for on-board anatomical visualization, localization, and adaptive dose calculation. Implementing an MR-only workflow by synthesizing MVCT from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) would offer numerous advantages for treatment planning and online adaptation. PURPOSE: In this work, we sought to synthesize MVCT (sMVCT) datasets from MRI using deep learning to demonstrate the feasibility of MRI-MVCT only treatment planning.
methodsMVCTs and T1-weighted MRIs for 120 patients treated for head-and-neck cancer were retrospectively acquired and co-registered. A deep neural network based on a fully-convolutional 3D U-Net architecture was implemented to map MRI intensity to MVCT HU. Input to the model were volumetric patches generated from paired MRI and MVCT datasets. The U-Net was initialized with random parameters and trained on a mean absolute error (MAE) objective function. Model accuracy was evaluated on 18 withheld test exams. sMVCTs were compared to respective MVCTs. Intensity-modulated volumetric radiotherapy (IMRT) plans were generated on MVCTs of four different disease sites and compared to plans calculated onto corresponding sMVCTs using the gamma metric and dose-volume-histograms (DVHs).
resultsMAE values between sMVCT and MVCT datasets were 93.3 ± 27.5, 78.2 ± 27.5, and 138.0 ± 43.4 HU for whole body, soft tissue, and bone volumes, respectively. Overall, there was good agreement between sMVCT and MVCT, with bone and air posing the greatest challenges. The retrospective dataset introduced additional deviations due to sinus filling or tumor growth/shrinkage between scans, differences in external contours due to variability in patient positioning, or when immobilization devices were absent from diagnostic MRIs. Dose distributions of IMRT plans evaluated for four test cases showed close agreement between sMVCT and MVCT images when evaluated using DVHs and gamma dose metrics, which averaged to 98.9 ± 1.0% and 96.8 ± 2.6% analyzed at 3%/3 mm and 2%/2 mm, respectively.
conclusionsMVCT datasets can be generated from T1-weighted MRI using a 3D deep convolutional neural network with dose calculation on a sample sMVCT in close agreement with the MVCT. These results demonstrate the feasibility of using MRI-derived sMVCT in an MR-only treatment planning workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.